ScholarGate
עוזר

השוואת שיטות

סקרו את השיטות שבחרתם זו לצד זו; שורות שבהן יש הבדל מודגשות.

תוקף תוכן רב-רמתי×תוקף מבחין×
תחוםפסיכומטריהפסיכומטריה
משפחהLatent structureLatent structure
שנת המקור1975–2000s1959
הוגה השיטהRooted in Lawshe (1975) for content validity; multilevel extension developed through multilevel psychometric literature from the 1990s onwardDonald T. Campbell and Donald W. Fiske
סוגValidity evaluation / expert judgmentValidity evidence / psychometric evaluation
מקור מכונןLynn, M. R. (1986). Determination and quantification of content validity. Nursing Research, 35(6), 382–385. DOI ↗Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81–105. DOI ↗
כינוייםhierarchical content validity, nested-data content validity, multilevel scale content evaluation, MCVdiscriminant validity evidence, divergent validity, DV, AVE-based discriminant validity
קשורות65
תקצירMultilevel content validity extends the classical content validity framework to settings where items, raters, or respondents are nested within hierarchical structures — such as students within schools, patients within clinics, or items rated by panels from distinct cultural or professional groups. It ensures that scale content is relevant and representative at every level of the hierarchy, not just in the aggregate.Discriminant validity is evidence that a latent construct is empirically distinct from other constructs it should differ from. Originating in Campbell and Fiske's multitrait-multimethod framework (1959), it is a core component of construct validity and a mandatory check in scale development and structural equation modeling.
ScholarGateמערך נתונים
  1. v1
  2. 2 מקורות
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 מקורות
  3. PUBLISHED

מעבר לחיפוש הורדת מצגת

ScholarGateהשוואת שיטות: Multilevel Content Validity · Discriminant Validity. אוחזר בתאריך 2026-06-17 מתוך https://scholargate.app/he/compare