ScholarGate
עוזר

השוואת שיטות

סקרו את השיטות שבחרתם זו לצד זו; שורות שבהן יש הבדל מודגשות.

תוקף תוכן רב-רמתי×תוקף מבנה×
תחוםפסיכומטריהפסיכומטריה
משפחהLatent structureLatent structure
שנת המקור1975–2000s1955
הוגה השיטהRooted in Lawshe (1975) for content validity; multilevel extension developed through multilevel psychometric literature from the 1990s onwardLee J. Cronbach & Paul E. Meehl
סוגValidity evaluation / expert judgmentValidity evaluation framework
מקור מכונןLynn, M. R. (1986). Determination and quantification of content validity. Nursing Research, 35(6), 382–385. DOI ↗Cronbach, L. J. & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302. DOI ↗
כינוייםhierarchical content validity, nested-data content validity, multilevel scale content evaluation, MCVconstruct validation, factorial validity, nomological validity evidence, validity of interpretation
קשורות66
תקצירMultilevel content validity extends the classical content validity framework to settings where items, raters, or respondents are nested within hierarchical structures — such as students within schools, patients within clinics, or items rated by panels from distinct cultural or professional groups. It ensures that scale content is relevant and representative at every level of the hierarchy, not just in the aggregate.Construct validity is the degree to which a test or scale actually measures the theoretical construct it is intended to measure. Introduced by Cronbach and Meehl in 1955, it is the central validity concern in psychological and educational measurement, evaluated by accumulating multiple lines of empirical and logical evidence rather than by any single statistical test.
ScholarGateמערך נתונים
  1. v1
  2. 2 מקורות
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 מקורות
  3. PUBLISHED

מעבר לחיפוש הורדת מצגת

ScholarGateהשוואת שיטות: Multilevel Content Validity · Construct Validity. אוחזר בתאריך 2026-06-15 מתוך https://scholargate.app/he/compare