השוואת שיטות
סקרו את השיטות שבחרתם זו לצד זו; שורות שבהן יש הבדל מודגשות.
| מהימנות מבחן-חוזר רב-קבוצתית× | בדיקת השוואתית של מבחני מדידה רב-קבוצתיים× | |
|---|---|---|
| תחום | פסיכומטריה | פסיכומטריה |
| משפחה | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| שנת המקור≠ | 1979–2000 | 1971–1993 |
| הוגה השיטה≠ | Systematic multi-group extensions developed alongside measurement invariance frameworks (Vandenberg & Lance, 2000); intraclass correlation foundation in Shrout & Fleiss (1979) | Jöreskog, K. G. (1971); Meredith, W. (1993) |
| סוג≠ | Reliability estimation across groups | Model comparison / hypothesis testing |
| מקור מכונן≠ | Shrout, P. E. & Fleiss, J. L. (1979). Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychological Bulletin, 86(2), 420–428. DOI ↗ | Vandenberg, R. J. & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3(1), 4–70. DOI ↗ |
| כינויים | multi-group temporal stability, cross-group test-retest reliability, group-comparative retest reliability, multi-sample temporal consistency | measurement invariance, factorial invariance, cross-group invariance, MI testing |
| קשורות≠ | 5 | 6 |
| תקציר≠ | Multi-group test-retest reliability evaluates whether a measure produces stable scores across time separately for two or more defined groups — such as different genders, age cohorts, or clinical populations — and determines whether the degree of that temporal stability is equivalent across those groups. | Multi-group measurement invariance testing examines whether a latent construct is measured in the same way across two or more distinct groups — such as cultures, genders, or age cohorts. It is a prerequisite for meaningful group comparisons of latent means or relationships, ensuring that observed score differences reflect true differences rather than measurement artifacts. |
| ScholarGateמערך נתונים ↗ |
|
|