ScholarGate
עוזר

השוואת שיטות

סקרו את השיטות שבחרתם זו לצד זו; שורות שבהן יש הבדל מודגשות.

פיתוח סולמות רב-קבוצתיים×ניתוח גורמים גישוש (EFA)×
תחוםפסיכומטריהסטטיסטיקה
משפחהLatent structureLatent structure
שנת המקור1971 (multi-group CFA); 2000 (applied synthesis for scale development)
הוגה השיטהJöreskog, K. G. (multi-group SEM framework); systematised for scale development by Vandenberg & Lance (2000)
סוגScale development / measurement model testingLatent variable / dimension reduction
מקור מכונןVandenberg, R. J., & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3(1), 4–70. DOI ↗Fabrigar, L. R., Wegener, D. T., MacCallum, R. C. & Strahan, E. J. (1999). Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 4(3), 272–299. DOI ↗
כינוייםMGSD, cross-group scale development, multi-sample scale development, comparative scale constructioncommon factor analysis, açımlayıcı faktör analizi, factor analysis
קשורות64
תקצירMulti-group scale development constructs and validates a measurement scale simultaneously across two or more distinct populations or groups. The approach integrates standard item generation and factor-analytic procedures with a systematic hierarchy of measurement invariance tests to ensure that the resulting scale measures the same construct in the same way in every target group.Exploratory factor analysis reduces a large set of observed variables into a smaller number of latent common factors. It is widely used in scale development and psychometrics to uncover the dimensional structure that underlies a set of correlated items, without specifying that structure in advance.
ScholarGateמערך נתונים
  1. v1
  2. 2 מקורות
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v2
  2. 2 מקורות
  3. PUBLISHED

מעבר לחיפוש הורדת מצגת

ScholarGateהשוואת שיטות: Multi-group scale development · EFA. אוחזר בתאריך 2026-06-15 מתוך https://scholargate.app/he/compare