ScholarGate
עוזר

השוואת שיטות

סקרו את השיטות שבחרתם זו לצד זו; שורות שבהן יש הבדל מודגשות.

סולם מונטגומרי-אסברג להערכת דיכאון (MADRS)×סקר מהיר של תסמיני דיכאון (QIDS)×
תחוםפסיכולוגיה קליניתפסיכולוגיה קלינית
משפחהProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
שנת המקור19792003
הוגה השיטהStuart Montgomery & Marie ÅsbergA. John Rush
סוגClinician-rated interview scaleSelf-report or clinician-administered questionnaire
מקור מכונןMontgomery, S. A., & Åsberg, M. (1979). A new depression scale designed to be sensitive to change. British Journal of Psychiatry, 134, 382–389. DOI ↗Rush, A. J., Trivedi, M. H., Ibrahim, H. M., Carmody, T. J., Arnow, B., Klein, D. N., & Ninan, P. T. (2003). The 16-item Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS), clinician rating (QIDS-C), and self-report (QIDS-SR): a psychometric evaluation in patients with chronic major depression. Biological Psychiatry, 54(5), 573–583. DOI ↗
כינוייםMADRS, Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating ScaleQIDS, Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Self Report, QIDS-SR
קשורות54
תקצירThe Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale is a 10-item clinician-rated assessment designed by Stuart Montgomery and Marie Åsberg in 1979 to measure depression severity and track treatment response. Published in the British Journal of Psychiatry, the MADRS was developed as an alternative to longer instruments like the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, emphasizing items most sensitive to treatment change. It has become a primary outcome measure in antidepressant trials and is widely used in both research and clinical practice across psychiatry, primary care, and medical specialty settings.The Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology is a 16-item assessment designed by A. John Rush and colleagues to efficiently measure the severity of depressive symptoms in adults. Published in Biological Psychiatry in 2003, the QIDS exists in both self-report (QIDS-SR) and clinician-rated (QIDS-C) versions. It was developed as a brief alternative to the longer Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (IDS, 30 items) while maintaining comprehensive coverage of DSM-IV depressive symptoms. The QIDS has become a standard outcome measure in treatment research, particularly in large comparative effectiveness trials.
ScholarGateמערך נתונים
  1. v1
  2. 3 מקורות
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 מקורות
  3. PUBLISHED

מעבר לחיפוש הורדת מצגת

ScholarGateהשוואת שיטות: Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale · Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology. אוחזר בתאריך 2026-06-19 מתוך https://scholargate.app/he/compare