ScholarGate
עוזר

השוואת שיטות

סקרו את השיטות שבחרתם זו לצד זו; שורות שבהן יש הבדל מודגשות.

דגימת יחידות מוניטריות×נהלים אנליטיים בביקורת×
תחוםחשבונאותחשבונאות
משפחהMCDMMCDM
שנת המקור19721983
הוגה השיטהAmerican Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) and audit theoristsAmerican Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA)
סוגStatistical sampling technique for substantive testingAudit procedure methodology
מקור מכונןAmerican Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). (2015). Audit Sampling. AU-C Section 530. AICPA Professional Standards. link ↗American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). (2015). Analytical Procedures. AU-C Section 520. AICPA Professional Standards. link ↗
כינוייםDollar Unit Sampling, MUS, Cumulative Monetary Amount SamplingAnalytical Review, Ratio Analysis, Trend Analysis
קשורות34
תקצירMonetary Unit Sampling (MUS) is a statistical sampling method widely used in audit substantive testing that selects individual dollar amounts from an account population rather than individual transactions. This approach is particularly effective for testing the correctness of financial statement balances because large-dollar items are automatically included more frequently in the sample, making it efficient for detecting material misstatements.Analytical procedures are evaluations of financial information made by studying plausible relationships among both financial and non-financial data. Rather than testing individual transactions, auditors develop expectations about what numbers should be and compare them to actual results, investigating significant differences. This approach is both required during audit planning and is often more cost-effective than detailed transaction testing.
ScholarGateמערך נתונים
  1. v1
  2. 2 מקורות
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 מקורות
  3. PUBLISHED

מעבר לחיפוש הורדת מצגת

ScholarGateהשוואת שיטות: Monetary Unit Sampling · Analytical Procedures in Auditing. אוחזר בתאריך 2026-06-17 מתוך https://scholargate.app/he/compare