ScholarGate
עוזר

השוואת שיטות

סקרו את השיטות שבחרתם זו לצד זו; שורות שבהן יש הבדל מודגשות.

Mixed-Use Index×Urban Sprawl Measurement×
תחוםUrban StudiesUrban Studies
משפחהProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
שנת המקור19972014
הוגה השיטהCervero & Kockelman (land-use diversity / 3Ds); Frank et al. (entropy walkability term)Reid Ewing & Shima Hamidi (building on Galster et al.)
סוגIndex of how evenly land uses are mixed within an areaComposite index combining multiple dimensions of urban form into a sprawl/compactness score
מקור מכונןCervero, R., & Kockelman, K. (1997). Travel demand and the 3Ds: density, diversity, and design. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 2(3), 199–219. DOI ↗Ewing, R., & Hamidi, S. (2015). Compactness versus sprawl: A review of recent evidence from the United States. Journal of Planning Literature, 30(4), 413–432. DOI ↗
כינוייםLand-Use Mix Entropy, Land-Use Diversity Index, Herfindahl Land-Use Index, Entropy Land-Use MixSprawl Index, Compactness Index of Sprawl, Ewing Sprawl Index, Composite Sprawl Measure
קשורות44
תקצירA mixed-use index measures how evenly different land uses — residential, retail, office, civic, industrial — are blended within an area, turning the planning ideal of vibrant, walkable mixed-use districts into a number. The dominant formulation borrows the entropy measure from information theory: a value near zero when one use dominates and near one when uses are perfectly balanced. Popularised through the 'density, diversity, design' framework of Cervero and Kockelman and embedded in walkability indices by Frank and colleagues, these indices quantify land-use diversity for studies of travel behaviour, walkability and urban vitality.Urban sprawl measurement quantifies how compact or sprawling a metropolitan region is by combining several distinct dimensions of urban form into a single composite index. The dominant approach, developed by Reid Ewing, Shima Hamidi and colleagues, captures four factors — development density, land-use mix, activity centering, and street-network connectivity — and folds standardized indicators of each into one score, calibrated so the average region equals 100 and higher values mean greater compactness. Because sprawl is multidimensional, no single variable such as density adequately describes it, which is why the composite-index strategy has become the standard for comparing regions and linking form to outcomes.
ScholarGateמערך נתונים
  1. v1
  2. 2 מקורות
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 מקורות
  3. PUBLISHED

מעבר לחיפוש הורדת מצגת

ScholarGateהשוואת שיטות: Mixed-Use Index · Urban Sprawl Measurement. אוחזר בתאריך 2026-06-25 מתוך https://scholargate.app/he/compare