השוואת שיטות
סקרו את השיטות שבחרתם זו לצד זו; שורות שבהן יש הבדל מודגשות.
| מטא-היסק בשיטות מעורבות× | תכנון שיטות מעורבות טרנספורמטיבי× | |
|---|---|---|
| תחום | תכנון מחקר | תכנון מחקר |
| משפחה | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| שנת המקור≠ | 1998–2003 | 2003–2009 |
| הוגה השיטה≠ | Abbas Tashakkori & Charles Teddlie | Donna M. Mertens; John W. Creswell & Vicki L. Plano Clark |
| סוג≠ | Mixed methods integration procedure | Mixed methods research design |
| מקור מכונן≠ | Teddlie, C., & Tashakkori, A. (2009). Foundations of Mixed Methods Research: Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches in the Social and Behavioral Sciences. Sage. ISBN: 978-0761930129 | Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (3rd ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1483344379 |
| כינויים | meta-inference, mixed methods overall inference, integrated inference, MMR meta-inference | transformative design, advocacy mixed methods, emancipatory mixed methods, social-justice mixed methods |
| קשורות | 6 | 6 |
| תקציר≠ | Mixed methods meta-inference is the overarching conclusion drawn at the end of a mixed methods study by systematically combining and integrating the separate inferences produced by the quantitative and qualitative strands. It represents the highest-level interpretive act in mixed methods research: moving beyond strand-specific findings to produce a unified, coherent understanding of the research problem that neither strand could yield alone. | Transformative mixed methods design embeds a social-justice or advocacy theoretical framework — such as feminism, critical race theory, disability studies, or indigenous worldviews — as the overarching lens that guides every decision about data collection, integration, and use. Both quantitative and qualitative strands serve the goal of advancing equity, challenging power structures, and producing actionable knowledge for marginalized communities. |
| ScholarGateמערך נתונים ↗ |
|
|