השוואת שיטות
סקרו את השיטות שבחרתם זו לצד זו; שורות שבהן יש הבדל מודגשות.
| דגימת שונות מקסימלית× | דגימת מטרה (Purposive Sampling)× | |
|---|---|---|
| תחום | מתודולוגיית סקרים | מתודולוגיית סקרים |
| משפחה | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| שנת המקור≠ | 1985 (Lincoln & Guba); elaborated 1990–2002 (Patton) | Formalized ~1980–1990 |
| הוגה השיטה≠ | Lincoln & Guba; systematised by Michael Quinn Patton | Michael Quinn Patton (systematic articulation); roots in early qualitative inquiry |
| סוג≠ | Purposive qualitative sampling strategy | Non-probability sampling strategy |
| מקור מכונן≠ | Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods (3rd ed.). Sage. Chapter 5: Purposeful Sampling. ISBN: 978-0761919711 | Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods (2nd ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-0803937796 |
| כינויים | maximum variation sampling, maximum diversity sampling, MVS, heterogeneous sampling | judgmental sampling, selective sampling, criterion-based sampling, purposeful sampling |
| קשורות≠ | 5 | 4 |
| תקציר≠ | Maximum variation sampling is a purposive qualitative sampling strategy in which the researcher deliberately selects cases that span the widest possible range of variation on dimensions central to the study. The goal is not statistical representation but the identification of common patterns that cut across diverse cases as well as the documentation of the unique ways each context shapes the phenomenon under investigation. | Purposive sampling is a non-probability strategy in which the researcher deliberately selects participants, documents, or cases that are information-rich with respect to the research question. Rather than drawing units at random, the researcher applies explicit criteria aligned with the study's purpose, maximising the depth and relevance of the data collected. It is the default sampling logic in most qualitative research designs and is also used in mixed-methods and applied evaluative work. |
| ScholarGateמערך נתונים ↗ |
|
|