ScholarGate
עוזר

השוואת שיטות

סקרו את השיטות שבחרתם זו לצד זו; שורות שבהן יש הבדל מודגשות.

תוקף נומולוגי אורכי×תוקף נומולוגי×
תחוםפסיכומטריהפסיכומטריה
משפחהLatent structureLatent structure
שנת המקור1955 (concept); longitudinal extension 1990s–2000s1955
הוגה השיטהCronbach & Meehl (nomological network concept, 1955); longitudinal extension developed in organizational and personality research from the 1990s onwardLee J. Cronbach & Paul E. Meehl
סוגValidity evaluationValidity evidence framework
מקור מכונןCronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302. DOI ↗Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302. DOI ↗
כינוייםlongitudinal construct validity, nomological network validation across time, longitudinal criterion-related validity, temporal nomological validitynomological network validity, construct network validity, nomological web validity
קשורות66
תקצירLongitudinal nomological validity evaluates whether a construct's theoretically predicted relationships with other constructs hold consistently across multiple measurement occasions. It extends the nomological network framework of Cronbach and Meehl (1955) to longitudinal designs, testing whether a scale behaves as theory demands not only at a single time point but over time.Nomological validity evaluates whether a construct behaves as theory predicts within a broader network of related constructs. It is not a single statistical test but an accumulation of evidence that the measure fits coherently into a web of theoretically grounded relationships — demonstrating that what is measured is what the theory says it should measure.
ScholarGateמערך נתונים
  1. v1
  2. 2 מקורות
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 מקורות
  3. PUBLISHED

מעבר לחיפוש הורדת מצגת

ScholarGateהשוואת שיטות: Longitudinal Nomological Validity · Nomological Validity. אוחזר בתאריך 2026-06-17 מתוך https://scholargate.app/he/compare