השוואת שיטות
סקרו את השיטות שבחרתם זו לצד זו; שורות שבהן יש הבדל מודגשות.
| ניתוח מטאפורות אורכי× | ניתוח שיח× | |
|---|---|---|
| תחום≠ | איכותני | מחקר איכותני |
| משפחה | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| שנת המקור≠ | 2000s–2010s (systematic longitudinal application) | 1989 (Fairclough); 1987 (Potter & Wetherell) |
| הוגה השיטה≠ | Lynne Cameron and colleagues (discourse dynamics framework); broader tradition rooted in Lakoff & Johnson's conceptual metaphor theory (1980) | Norman Fairclough; Jonathan Potter and Margaret Wetherell |
| סוג≠ | Qualitative analytic method | Method |
| מקור מכונן≠ | Cameron, L., & Maslen, R. (Eds.). (2010). Metaphor Analysis: Research Practice in Applied Linguistics, Social Sciences and the Humanities. Equinox. ISBN: 978-1845531140 | Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. Longman. link ↗ |
| כינויים≠ | LMA, diachronic metaphor analysis, longitudinal conceptual metaphor study, repeated-measures metaphor analysis | DA, Critical Discourse Analysis, Discursive Analysis |
| קשורות≠ | 5 | 2 |
| תקציר≠ | Longitudinal Metaphor Analysis (LMA) is a qualitative method that tracks how individuals or groups use metaphors across multiple time points to reveal conceptual, attitudinal, or identity shifts. Grounded in conceptual metaphor theory and discourse dynamics, it treats metaphor not as mere rhetorical decoration but as a window into evolving thought, belief, and meaning-making over time. | Discourse analysis is a qualitative research methodology that examines how language, communication, and power shape meaning, identity, and social reality. Developed across linguistics, sociology, and psychology (particularly by Norman Fairclough and Jonathan Potter), discourse analysis goes beyond content to analyze language use as a social practice that constitutes and reflects power relations, ideologies, and social structures. |
| ScholarGateמערך נתונים ↗ |
|
|