השוואת שיטות
סקרו את השיטות שבחרתם זו לצד זו; שורות שבהן יש הבדל מודגשות.
| ניתוח שיח אורכי× | ניתוח שיח× | |
|---|---|---|
| תחום≠ | איכותני | מחקר איכותני |
| משפחה | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| שנת המקור≠ | 1990s–2000s (systematised as a distinct approach) | 1989 (Fairclough); 1987 (Potter & Wetherell) |
| הוגה השיטה≠ | Norman Fairclough; Jan Blommaert; applied linguists in sociolinguistics and CDA traditions | Norman Fairclough; Jonathan Potter and Margaret Wetherell |
| סוג≠ | Qualitative longitudinal research design | Method |
| מקור מכונן≠ | Fairclough, N. (2003). Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research. Routledge. ISBN: 978-0415258937 | Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. Longman. link ↗ |
| כינויים≠ | LDA, diachronic discourse analysis, longitudinal CDA, discourse change analysis | DA, Critical Discourse Analysis, Discursive Analysis |
| קשורות≠ | 6 | 2 |
| תקציר≠ | Longitudinal Discourse Analysis (LDA) is a qualitative research approach that examines how discourse — language in use, texts, talk, and representational practices — changes across time. Rather than analysing a single snapshot of language, LDA collects and compares discourse data at multiple points to uncover how meanings, identities, ideologies, or social practices evolve, stabilise, or shift under the influence of historical, institutional, or societal forces. | Discourse analysis is a qualitative research methodology that examines how language, communication, and power shape meaning, identity, and social reality. Developed across linguistics, sociology, and psychology (particularly by Norman Fairclough and Jonathan Potter), discourse analysis goes beyond content to analyze language use as a social practice that constitutes and reflects power relations, ideologies, and social structures. |
| ScholarGateמערך נתונים ↗ |
|
|