השוואת שיטות
סקרו את השיטות שבחרתם זו לצד זו; שורות שבהן יש הבדל מודגשות.
| תוקף מתכנס אורכי× | תוקף מבחין אורכי× | |
|---|---|---|
| תחום | פסיכומטריה | פסיכומטריה |
| משפחה | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| שנת המקור≠ | 1997–2003 | 1993–2000 |
| הוגה השיטה≠ | Cole & Maxwell; Widaman & Reise | Formalized through SEM-based validity traditions (Campbell & Fiske, 1959; Cole & Maxwell, 1993) |
| סוג≠ | Validity evidence framework | Validity assessment / measurement quality |
| מקור מכונן≠ | Cole, D. A. & Maxwell, S. E. (2003). Testing mediational models with longitudinal data: Questions and tips in the use of structural equation modeling. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 112(4), 558–577. DOI ↗ | Cole, D. A. & Maxwell, S. E. (1993). Testing mediational models with longitudinal data: Questions and tips in the use of structural equation modeling. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 112(4), 558–577. DOI ↗ |
| כינויים | longitudinal construct validity, repeated-measure convergent validity, cross-time convergent validity, temporal convergent validity | LDV, longitudinal construct distinctiveness, cross-time discriminant validity, temporal discriminant validity |
| קשורות≠ | 6 | 4 |
| תקציר≠ | Longitudinal convergent validity evaluates whether a scale's indicators correlate with theoretically related constructs not just at a single time point but consistently across repeated measurement occasions. It extends standard convergent validity testing into longitudinal designs to ensure that the scale measures the intended construct in the same meaningful way over time. | Longitudinal discriminant validity tests whether a psychological construct measured at two or more time points is empirically distinct across occasions — ensuring that the same construct does not collapse into a single undifferentiated mass over time. It is a prerequisite for meaningful change modeling in panel and longitudinal research. |
| ScholarGateמערך נתונים ↗ |
|
|