ScholarGate
עוזר

השוואת שיטות

סקרו את השיטות שבחרתם זו לצד זו; שורות שבהן יש הבדל מודגשות.

תוקף תוכן אורכי×תוקף מבנה×
תחוםפסיכומטריהפסיכומטריה
משפחהLatent structureLatent structure
שנת המקור1995–20001955
הוגה השיטהHaynes, Richard & Kubany (1995); extended to longitudinal contexts by measurement invariance researchersLee J. Cronbach & Paul E. Meehl
סוגValidity evaluation techniqueValidity evaluation framework
מקור מכונןHaynes, S. N., Richard, D. C. S., & Kubany, E. S. (1995). Content validity in psychological assessment: A functional approach to concepts and methods. Psychological Assessment, 7(3), 238–247. DOI ↗Cronbach, L. J. & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302. DOI ↗
כינוייםlongitudinal content validation, temporal content validity, repeated-measure content validity, content validity over timeconstruct validation, factorial validity, nomological validity evidence, validity of interpretation
קשורות66
תקצירLongitudinal content validity evaluates whether the items of a measure adequately and consistently represent the intended content domain not only at a single point in time but across repeated administrations. It ensures that the conceptual coverage of a scale remains appropriate and stable as measurement occasions accumulate over a study period.Construct validity is the degree to which a test or scale actually measures the theoretical construct it is intended to measure. Introduced by Cronbach and Meehl in 1955, it is the central validity concern in psychological and educational measurement, evaluated by accumulating multiple lines of empirical and logical evidence rather than by any single statistical test.
ScholarGateמערך נתונים
  1. v1
  2. 2 מקורות
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 מקורות
  3. PUBLISHED

מעבר לחיפוש הורדת מצגת

ScholarGateהשוואת שיטות: Longitudinal content validity · Construct Validity. אוחזר בתאריך 2026-06-15 מתוך https://scholargate.app/he/compare