ScholarGate
עוזר

השוואת שיטות

סקרו את השיטות שבחרתם זו לצד זו; שורות שבהן יש הבדל מודגשות.

ניתוח משפטי השוואתי אורכי×מחקר ארכיוני היסטורי×
תחוםשיטות שדהשיטות שדה
משפחהProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
שנת המקורLate 20th century (comparative law foundational texts 1960s–1998; longitudinal integration from 1990s onward)19th century (formalized ~1820s–1880s)
הוגה השיטהKonrad Zweigert and Hein Kotz (comparative law foundation); longitudinal dimension integrated in socio-legal and legal history scholarshipHistorians and archivists; systematised through the professionalization of historical scholarship in the 19th century
סוגQualitative-interpretive legal research designQualitative primary-source research
מקור מכונןZweigert, K., & Kotz, H. (1998). An Introduction to Comparative Law (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press. ISBN: 978-0198268598Hill, M. R. (1993). Archival Strategies and Techniques. Sage Publications. ISBN: 978-0803951853
כינוייםLCLA, diachronic comparative law, longitudinal legal comparison, dynamic comparative legal researcharchival research, historical document analysis, archival history, primary source research
קשורות56
תקצירLongitudinal comparative legal analysis examines how legal rules, doctrines, or institutions develop and diverge across two or more legal systems over an extended period. By combining the spatial dimension of comparative law with the temporal dimension of longitudinal research, it captures not just differences between jurisdictions at a single point but the trajectories of legal change — convergence, divergence, transplantation, and resistance — over years or decades.Historical archival research is a systematic method of investigating the past through the critical examination of primary source documents preserved in archives, libraries, and institutional collections. Researchers locate, access, authenticate, and interpret original records — such as government documents, correspondence, diaries, maps, and institutional files — to reconstruct events, trace processes, and build evidence-based historical arguments. It is foundational to historiography and widely applied across humanities and social science disciplines.
ScholarGateמערך נתונים
  1. v1
  2. 2 מקורות
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 מקורות
  3. PUBLISHED

מעבר לחיפוש הורדת מצגת

ScholarGateהשוואת שיטות: Longitudinal comparative legal analysis · Historical Archival Research. אוחזר בתאריך 2026-06-20 מתוך https://scholargate.app/he/compare