השוואת שיטות
סקרו את השיטות שבחרתם זו לצד זו; שורות שבהן יש הבדל מודגשות.
| סולם רווחה בזמן סגר (Lockdown Wellbeing Scale)× | סולם עייפות ממגפה× | |
|---|---|---|
| תחום | בריאות הציבור | בריאות הציבור |
| משפחה | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| שנת המקור≠ | 2021 | 2020 |
| הוגה השיטה≠ | Giuntella et al. | Restrepo et al. |
| סוג | Self-report | Self-report |
| מקור מכונן≠ | Giuntella, O., Hyde, K., Saccardo, S., & Solomon, S. (2021). Lifestyle and mental health disruptions during COVID-19. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(9), e2016632118. DOI ↗ | Restrepo, A., Pfeil, J., & Farias, M. (2021). Pandemic fatigue and the risk of SARS-CoV-2 transmission in a representative US sample. Nature Medicine, 27(6), 1093–1101. link ↗ |
| כינויים | LWS, Restrictions Wellbeing Scale | PFS, COVID Fatigue Scale |
| קשורות | 3 | 3 |
| תקציר≠ | The Lockdown Wellbeing Scale (LWS) measures the specific psychological and social impacts of mobility restrictions and lockdown policies on individual well-being. Developed by Giuntella and colleagues from economic and social data on pandemic restrictions, it captures dimensions of isolation, social disconnection, routinization disruption, and perceived loss of autonomy. The LWS is distinct from anxiety/depression measures, focusing instead on how restrictive policies themselves affect quality of life and social well-being. | The Pandemic Fatigue Scale (PFS) measures psychological exhaustion and reduced motivation to maintain protective behaviors during prolonged pandemics. Developed by Restrepo and colleagues, it captures the phenomenon whereby individuals progressively abandon preventive measures (distancing, mask-wearing, testing) despite ongoing transmission risk, driven by 'fatigue' or loss of motivation rather than reduced threat perception. The PFS has become essential for monitoring behavioral adherence trends and explaining divergence between risk and protective behavior during multi-wave pandemics. |
| ScholarGateמערך נתונים ↗ |
|
|