ScholarGate
עוזר

השוואת שיטות

סקרו את השיטות שבחרתם זו לצד זו; שורות שבהן יש הבדל מודגשות.

אתנוגרפיה לשונית×ניתוח שיח×
תחוםבלשנותמחקר איכותני
משפחהProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
שנת המקור19981989 (Fairclough); 1987 (Potter & Wetherell)
הוגה השיטהBen RamptonNorman Fairclough; Jonathan Potter and Margaret Wetherell
סוגEmpirical process pipelineMethod
מקור מכונןRampton, B. (2007). Neo-Hymesian linguistic ethnography in the United Kingdom. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 11(5), 584-607. DOI ↗Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. Longman. link ↗
כינוייםEthnographic Linguistics, Sociolinguistic EthnographyDA, Critical Discourse Analysis, Discursive Analysis
קשורות22
תקצירLinguistic Ethnography is a qualitative research approach combining ethnographic fieldwork with detailed linguistic analysis to understand language use in cultural context. Developed by researchers like Ben Rampton, it examines how people use language within communities, institutions, and social interactions while paying attention to identity, power, and meaning-making. This method integrates sociolinguistics, anthropology, and discourse analysis to produce rich, contextualized understandings of language-in-society.Discourse analysis is a qualitative research methodology that examines how language, communication, and power shape meaning, identity, and social reality. Developed across linguistics, sociology, and psychology (particularly by Norman Fairclough and Jonathan Potter), discourse analysis goes beyond content to analyze language use as a social practice that constitutes and reflects power relations, ideologies, and social structures.
ScholarGateמערך נתונים
  1. v1
  2. 3 מקורות
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 מקורות
  3. PUBLISHED

מעבר לחיפוש הורדת מצגת

ScholarGateהשוואת שיטות: Linguistic Ethnography · Discourse Analysis. אוחזר בתאריך 2026-06-18 מתוך https://scholargate.app/he/compare