השוואת שיטות
סקרו את השיטות שבחרתם זו לצד זו; שורות שבהן יש הבדל מודגשות.
| ניתוח תוכן משפטי× | ניתוח שיח× | |
|---|---|---|
| תחום≠ | שיטות שדה | מחקר איכותני |
| משפחה | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| שנת המקור≠ | 1940s–1970s (applied systematically to legal texts) | 1989 (Fairclough); 1987 (Potter & Wetherell) |
| הוגה השיטה≠ | Interdisciplinary; foundational content analysis by Harold Lasswell (1940s); applied to legal texts by empirical legal scholars from the 1970s onward | Norman Fairclough; Jonathan Potter and Margaret Wetherell |
| סוג≠ | Systematic qualitative-quantitative text analysis | Method |
| מקור מכונן≠ | Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology (2nd ed.). Sage Publications. ISBN: 978-0761915454 | Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. Longman. link ↗ |
| כינויים≠ | LCA, legal text analysis, jurimetric content analysis, statutory content analysis | DA, Critical Discourse Analysis, Discursive Analysis |
| קשורות≠ | 6 | 2 |
| תקציר≠ | Legal content analysis applies the systematic procedures of content analysis to legal texts — statutes, regulations, judicial opinions, treaties, and legal commentaries — in order to identify patterns, themes, and trends across a corpus of legal material. It bridges qualitative legal scholarship and quantitative social-science methods, enabling researchers to draw reproducible, evidence-based conclusions about how law is written, applied, or has changed over time. | Discourse analysis is a qualitative research methodology that examines how language, communication, and power shape meaning, identity, and social reality. Developed across linguistics, sociology, and psychology (particularly by Norman Fairclough and Jonathan Potter), discourse analysis goes beyond content to analyze language use as a social practice that constitutes and reflects power relations, ideologies, and social structures. |
| ScholarGateמערך נתונים ↗ |
|
|