השוואת שיטות
סקרו את השיטות שבחרתם זו לצד זו; שורות שבהן יש הבדל מודגשות.
| ניתוח פריטים (תורת המבחן הקלאסית)× | ניתוח גורמים מאשר (CFA)× | |
|---|---|---|
| תחום | פסיכומטריה | פסיכומטריה |
| משפחה | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| שנת המקור≠ | 1979 | 1969 |
| הוגה השיטה≠ | Classical Test Theory tradition; foundational texts by Allen & Yen (1979) and Crocker & Algina (1986) | Karl Gustav Jöreskog |
| סוג≠ | Descriptive / psychometric screening | Hypothesis-testing latent variable model |
| מקור מכונן≠ | Allen, M. J. & Yen, W. M. (1979). Introduction to Measurement Theory. Brooks/Cole. ISBN: 978-0818501333 | Jöreskog, K. G. (1969). A general approach to confirmatory maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 34(2), 183–202. DOI ↗ |
| כינויים≠ | Madde Analizi (Klasik Test Kuramı), CTT item analysis, classical item analysis | CFA, confirmatory FA, measurement model, restricted factor analysis |
| קשורות≠ | 5 | 4 |
| תקציר≠ | Item analysis is the foundational psychometric procedure for evaluating the quality of individual test or scale items within the Classical Test Theory (CTT) framework, as systematised by Allen and Yen (1979) and Crocker and Algina (1986). It produces an item difficulty index, an item discrimination index, and a distractor analysis for each item, enabling test developers to identify items that are too easy, too hard, or failing to separate high- and low-ability respondents. | Confirmatory factor analysis tests a researcher-specified factor structure against observed data. Unlike exploratory approaches, the researcher decides in advance which indicators load on which latent factor, and the model is evaluated by how closely the implied covariance matrix reproduces the sample covariance matrix. CFA is central to scale validation, construct validity assessment, and measurement invariance testing. |
| ScholarGateמערך נתונים ↗ |
|
|