ScholarGate
עוזר

השוואת שיטות

סקרו את השיטות שבחרתם זו לצד זו; שורות שבהן יש הבדל מודגשות.

ניתוח מטאפורות פרשני×Thematic Analysis×
תחוםאיכותנימחקר איכותני
משפחהProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
שנת המקור1980 (conceptual foundations); 2000s (systematic qualitative procedure)2006
הוגה השיטהRudolf Schmitt (systematic procedure); grounded in Lakoff & Johnson's conceptual metaphor theoryVirginia Braun and Victoria Clarke
סוגQualitative interpretive analysisMethod
מקור מכונןLakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. University of Chicago Press. ISBN: 978-0226468013Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. DOI ↗
כינוייםIMA, hermeneutic metaphor analysis, qualitative metaphor analysis, interpretive conceptual metaphor analysisTA, Reflexive Thematic Analysis
קשורות63
תקצירInterpretive metaphor analysis is a qualitative method that systematically identifies and interprets the conceptual metaphors embedded in participants' language to understand how they make meaning of their experiences. Rooted in Lakoff and Johnson's conceptual metaphor theory and adapted for empirical social research by Rudolf Schmitt, it applies a hermeneutic lens to treat metaphors not as stylistic ornaments but as windows into underlying cognitive and cultural frames.Thematic Analysis (TA) is a qualitative research methodology for identifying, analyzing, and reporting patterns (themes) in qualitative data. Developed systematically by Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke (2006), TA is flexible and accessible, applicable across diverse theoretical frameworks and data types, making it one of the most widely used qualitative methods in psychology, health research, and social sciences.
ScholarGateמערך נתונים
  1. v1
  2. 2 מקורות
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 מקורות
  3. PUBLISHED

מעבר לחיפוש הורדת מצגת

ScholarGateהשוואת שיטות: Interpretive Metaphor Analysis · Thematic Analysis. אוחזר בתאריך 2026-06-18 מתוך https://scholargate.app/he/compare