השוואת שיטות

	אוטו-אתנוגרפיה פרשנית – מחקר אוטו-אתנוגרפי פרשני	אוטואתנוגרפיה
תחום	איכותני	איכותני
משפחה	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
שנת המקור	1990s–2000s	Late 20th century (term coined 1979; method consolidated 1990s–2000s)
הוגה השיטה	Carolyn Ellis, Arthur Bochner (evocative strand); Leon Anderson (analytic/interpretive strand)	Carolyn Ellis, Arthur Bochner, Norman Denzin (prominent theorists); David Hayano coined the term in 1979
סוג	Qualitative self-study design	Qualitative research method
מקור מכונן	Ellis, C., Adams, T. E., & Bochner, A. P. (2011). Autoethnography: An overview. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 12(1), Art. 10.	Ellis, C. (2004). The Ethnographic I: A Methodological Novel about Autoethnography. AltaMira Press. ISBN: 978-0759100947
כינויים	interpretive autoethnography, evocative autoethnography, analytic autoethnography, IAE	auto-ethnography, AE, personal narrative research, self-ethnography
קשורות	6	6
תקציר	Interpretive autoethnography is a qualitative research design in which the researcher uses systematic analysis of their own lived experience as the primary data source, moving beyond evocative personal narrative to connect personal meaning with broader cultural, social, or theoretical frameworks. Drawing on Leon Anderson's analytic strand and building on Ellis and Bochner's foundational work, it treats the researcher's self-account as both evidence and interpretive lens, subjecting personal stories to disciplined ethnographic and theoretical scrutiny to generate insights that extend beyond the individual case.	Autoethnography is a qualitative research method in which the researcher uses systematic self-reflection and personal narrative to examine their own experiences within a cultural, social, or organizational context. By treating the self as both subject and instrument, autoethnography connects individual lived experience to broader cultural patterns, making personal stories analytically and socially significant. It bridges autobiography and ethnography, producing accounts that are simultaneously evocative and scholarly.