השוואת שיטות
סקרו את השיטות שבחרתם זו לצד זו; שורות שבהן יש הבדל מודגשות.
| Intergroup Threat Scale× | Emotion Appraisal in Politics× | |
|---|---|---|
| תחום | פסיכולוגיה פוליטית | פסיכולוגיה פוליטית |
| משפחה | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| שנת המקור≠ | 1999 | 2000 |
| הוגה השיטה≠ | Walter G. Stephan & Cookie White Stephan | George Marcus, Russell Neuman & Michael MacKuen; Ted Brader |
| סוג≠ | Self-report attitude scale | Survey/lab experiment |
| מקור מכונן≠ | Stephan, W. G., Ybarra, O., & Bachman, G. (1999). Prejudice toward immigrants. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29(11), 2221-2237. DOI ↗ | Marcus, G. E., Neuman, W. R., & MacKuen, M. (2000). Affective intelligence and political judgment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ISBN: 9780226504698 |
| כינויים | Integrated Threat Scale, Realistic and Symbolic Threat Scale, Perceived Threat Scale | Affective Intelligence Experiment, Political Emotion Appraisal Study, Discrete Emotions Politics Measure |
| קשורות | 4 | 4 |
| תקציר≠ | The Intergroup Threat Scale operationalizes intergroup (originally integrated) threat theory (Stephan & Stephan), which holds that prejudice toward an out-group arises from perceived realistic threats (to the in-group's resources, power, or welfare) and symbolic threats (to its values, beliefs, and worldview). It is a self-report measure widely used to explain attitudes toward immigrants and other out-groups in political psychology. | Emotion appraisal in politics studies how distinct emotions, anxiety, anger, enthusiasm, and others, arise from cognitive appraisals of political events and in turn shape attention, information seeking, persuasion, and participation. It combines appraisal theory with affective intelligence theory (Marcus, Neuman and MacKuen, 2000) and Brader's (2006) work on emotional campaign appeals, typically measured through experiments and surveys that elicit and analyze discrete emotional responses. |
| ScholarGateמערך נתונים ↗ |
|
|