השוואת שיטות
סקרו את השיטות שבחרתם זו לצד זו; שורות שבהן יש הבדל מודגשות.
| סולם מגע בין-קבוצתי× | מדד הערכים הדמוקרטיים× | |
|---|---|---|
| תחום | סוציולוגיה פוליטית | סוציולוגיה פוליטית |
| משפחה | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| שנת המקור≠ | 1954–2008 | 1999–2015 |
| הוגה השיטה≠ | Gordon Allport, Thomas Pettigrew, Linda Tropp | Russell Dalton, Hans-Dieter Klingemann, Christian Welzel |
| סוג | Self-report questionnaire | Self-report questionnaire |
| מקור מכונן≠ | Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Addison-Wesley. link ↗ | Dalton, R. J. (2004). Democratic challenges, democratic choices: The erosion of political support in advanced industrial democracies. Oxford University Press. link ↗ |
| כינויים | ICS, Contact Quality Index | DVS, Democratic Attitudes Scale |
| קשורות≠ | 5 | 4 |
| תקציר≠ | The Intergroup Contact Scale measures the quantity and quality of face-to-face interaction between members of different social groups (racial, ethnic, religious, national, or other categories). Rooted in Gordon Allport's contact hypothesis (1954), which proposed that prejudice decreases when groups interact under favorable conditions, the scale is fundamental in research on prejudice reduction, integration, and intergroup relations. | The Democratic Values Scale measures commitment to core principles of democratic governance including free speech, rule of law, fair elections, protection of minorities, and transparent institutions. Rather than measuring support for democracy as a system (which is nearly universal in principle), it captures depth of commitment to democratic norms, tolerance for dissent, and willingness to protect rights of political opponents. Developed by comparative political scientists including Dalton, Klingemann, and Welzel, it reveals psychological foundations of democratic stability. |
| ScholarGateמערך נתונים ↗ |
|
|