ScholarGate
עוזר

השוואת שיטות

סקרו את השיטות שבחרתם זו לצד זו; שורות שבהן יש הבדל מודגשות.

סולם אימוץ חדשנות×סולם עמדות בנוגע לפרקטיקה מבוססת-ראיות (EBPAS-36)×
תחוםמדע היישוםמדע היישום
משפחהProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
שנת המקור19832005
הוגה השיטהEverett M. Rogers, PhD; Tornatzky & Klein framework; multiple measurement approachesGregory A. Aarons, PhD
סוגSelf-report questionnaire or behavioral trackingSelf-report questionnaire
מקור מכונןRogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of Innovations (5th ed.). New York: Free Press. link ↗Aarons, G. A. (2011). Evidence-Based Practice Attitude Scale-50 (EBPAS-50) and EBPAS-36 short form: Psychometric properties. Implementation Science, 6(1), 89. link ↗
כינוייםAdoption Scale, Innovation Adoption, Adoption ReadinessEBPAS, EBPAS-36, Evidence-Based Practice Attitude
קשורות55
תקצירInnovation Adoption refers to the extent to which an innovation, evidence-based practice, or new technology is actually used by the target population or in the target setting. Adoption is typically measured as the percentage of eligible users/staff who have adopted the innovation by a specific time point, or the trajectory of adoption over time (adoption curve). Grounded in Rogers' Diffusion of Innovations theory, adoption is a key implementation outcome distinct from readiness (willingness to adopt), fidelity (quality of delivery), or effectiveness (impact on outcomes). An innovation can be widely adopted but delivered with low fidelity, or adopted by only a subset of users despite being efficacious. Adoption curves reflect organizational readiness, innovation-context fit, and implementation strategy effectiveness. Adoption is often the first implementation outcome to emerge, typically preceding fidelity and effectiveness improvements.The EBPAS-36 is a 36-item self-report questionnaire that assesses clinicians' and organizational leaders' attitudes toward adopting and implementing evidence-based practices (EBP). Developed by Aarons in 2005 and refined through multiple validation studies, it measures four core dimensions: perceived requirements to adopt EBP, the appeal and usefulness of EBP to individual practice, organizational openness to innovation, and perceived divergence between current practice and EBP requirements. The EBPAS is widely used in healthcare, mental health, child welfare, and substance abuse treatment settings to predict adoption readiness and guide implementation planning.
ScholarGateמערך נתונים
  1. v1
  2. 2 מקורות
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 מקורות
  3. PUBLISHED

מעבר לחיפוש הורדת מצגת

ScholarGateהשוואת שיטות: Adoption Scale · EBPAS-36. אוחזר בתאריך 2026-06-19 מתוך https://scholargate.app/he/compare