השוואת שיטות
סקרו את השיטות שבחרתם זו לצד זו; שורות שבהן יש הבדל מודגשות.
| HCR-20v3: ניהול סיכונים קליני היסטורי-20× | SAPROF: הערכה מובנית של גורמים מגנים מפני אלימות× | |
|---|---|---|
| תחום | פסיכולוגיה משפטית | פסיכולוגיה משפטית |
| משפחה | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| שנת המקור≠ | 2013 | 2012 |
| הוגה השיטה≠ | Kevin S. Douglas, Stephen D. Hart, Christopher D. Webster, et al. | Vivienne de Vogel, Corine de Ruiter, Yvonne Bouman, Merike de Vries Robbé |
| סוג | Clinician-rated | Clinician-rated |
| מקור מכונן≠ | Douglas, K. S., Hart, S. D., Webster, C. D., Belfrage, H., Guy, L. S., & Wilson, C. M. (2013). HCR-20v3: Assessing risk for violence. Simon Fraser University Mental Health Law Program. link ↗ | de Vogel, V., de Ruiter, C., Bouman, Y., & de Vries Robbé, M. (2012). SAPROF: Structured Assessment of Protective Factors for violence risk (Version 3). Forum Educatief. link ↗ |
| כינויים | HCR-20v3, Historical Clinical Risk Management | SAPROF, de Vogel SAPROF |
| קשורות≠ | 5 | 4 |
| תקציר≠ | The HCR-20v3 is a structured professional judgment framework developed by Douglas, Hart, and colleagues for the assessment of risk for violence among adolescents and adults in mental health, criminal justice, and forensic settings. Published in 2013, it represents the third version of one of the most widely validated risk assessment instruments in forensic psychology, synthesizing clinical judgment with empirical evidence of violence risk factors. | The Structured Assessment of Protective Factors for Violence Risk (SAPROF) is a 17-item structured professional judgment tool developed by de Vogel, de Ruiter, Bouman, and colleagues (2012) to identify protective factors and strengths in individuals undergoing violence risk assessment. It complements risk assessment instruments (e.g., HCR-20v3) by systematically evaluating resilience, social support, motivation, and positive functioning—domains that mitigate violence risk and inform rehabilitation potential. |
| ScholarGateמערך נתונים ↗ |
|
|