השוואת שיטות
סקרו את השיטות שבחרתם זו לצד זו; שורות שבהן יש הבדל מודגשות.
| פאזינג× | בדיקות אבטחה סטטיות של יישומים× | |
|---|---|---|
| תחום | קריפטוגרפיה | קריפטוגרפיה |
| משפחה | Machine learning | Machine learning |
| שנת המקור≠ | 1990 | 2000s |
| הוגה השיטה≠ | Barton Miller | Various researchers |
| סוג≠ | random input-based testing technique | source code vulnerability detection |
| מקור מכונן≠ | Miller, B. P., Fredriksen, L., & So, B. (1990). An empirical study of the reliability of UNIX utilities. Communications of the ACM, 33(12), 32-44. DOI ↗ | Chess, B., & West, J. (2007). Secure Programming with Static Analysis. Addison-Wesley Professional. ISBN: 978-0321424778 |
| כינויים | fuzz testing, fuzzer, mutation testing | SAST, white-box testing, source code analysis |
| קשורות | 3 | 3 |
| תקציר≠ | Fuzzing is a software testing technique that inputs large numbers of random or semi-random test cases to a program to find bugs, crashes, and security vulnerabilities. Pioneered by Barton Miller in 1990, fuzzing has become a primary method for discovering zero-day vulnerabilities in complex software. Modern fuzzing tools like libFuzzer, AFL, and HoneyPot combine coverage-guided mutation with instrumentation to efficiently explore program paths and trigger vulnerabilities. Fuzzing has discovered thousands of critical vulnerabilities in major software including browsers, compilers, and cryptographic libraries. | Static Application Security Testing (SAST) is a security analysis technique that examines source code or compiled binaries without executing the program to identify vulnerabilities, code quality issues, and security flaws. Developed in the 2000s, SAST analyzes code structure, data flow, and control flow to detect potential bugs such as SQL injection, buffer overflows, and insecure cryptographic usage. SAST is widely integrated into development workflows as a shift-left security practice, enabling early detection of vulnerabilities before code reaches production. |
| ScholarGateמערך נתונים ↗ |
|
|