ScholarGate
עוזר

השוואת שיטות

סקרו את השיטות שבחרתם זו לצד זו; שורות שבהן יש הבדל מודגשות.

התאמת ציון נטייה דינמית×הפרש-הפרשים דינמי×
תחוםהסקה סיבתיתהסקה סיבתית
משפחהRegression modelRegression model
שנת המקור1986-20102021
הוגה השיטהRobins (1986) on sequential treatments; Lechner & Miquel (2010) on dynamic matchingCallaway & Sant'Anna; Sun & Abraham
סוגSequential causal matchingCausal inference / quasi-experimental
מקור מכונןLechner, M., & Miquel, R. (2010). Identification of the effects of dynamic treatments by sequential conditional independence assumptions. Empirical Economics, 39(1), 111-137. DOI ↗Callaway, B., & Sant'Anna, P. H. C. (2021). Difference-in-differences with multiple time periods. Journal of Econometrics, 225(2), 200-230. DOI ↗
כינוייםdynamic PSM, sequential propensity score matching, longitudinal propensity matching, DPSMDynamic DiD, Staggered DiD, Event-time DiD, Heterogeneous-timing DiD
קשורות64
תקצירDynamic Propensity Score Matching (DPSM) extends classic propensity score matching to settings where treatment is assigned repeatedly over time and earlier treatment choices influence later ones. It estimates the causal effect of entire treatment sequences or regime changes by constructing matched comparisons at each decision point using the full history of covariates and prior treatments.Dynamic Difference-in-Differences extends the classic DiD framework to settings where units adopt treatment at different times. Rather than collapsing all variation into a single 2x2 comparison, it estimates group-time average treatment effects for each adoption cohort at each calendar period, then aggregates them into interpretable summaries of the causal effect over event time.
ScholarGateמערך נתונים
  1. v1
  2. 2 מקורות
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 מקורות
  3. PUBLISHED

מעבר לחיפוש הורדת מצגת

ScholarGateהשוואת שיטות: Dynamic Propensity Score Matching · Dynamic Difference-in-Differences. אוחזר בתאריך 2026-06-17 מתוך https://scholargate.app/he/compare