ScholarGate
עוזר

השוואת שיטות

סקרו את השיטות שבחרתם זו לצד זו; שורות שבהן יש הבדל מודגשות.

מערך ניסוי כפול-סמיות עם מדידה לפני ואחרי×תכנון ניסויי עם קבוצת ביקורת×
תחוםתכנון ניסוייםתכנון ניסויים
משפחהProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
שנת המקורMid-20th century (combined form widely adopted 1960s onward)1935 (Fisher); 1963 (Campbell & Stanley codification)
הוגה השיטהCampbell & Stanley (formalized pretest-posttest design, 1963); double-blind blinding convention developed in clinical pharmacology (19th-20th century)Ronald A. Fisher; systematised by Donald T. Campbell & Julian C. Stanley
סוגTrue experimental designExperimental research design
מקור מכונןCampbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. In N. L. Gage (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Teaching (pp. 171-246). Rand McNally. link ↗Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1963). Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research. Rand McNally. link ↗
כינוייםDB-pretest-posttest design, double-blind pre-post design, masked pretest-posttest RCT, double-masked pre-post experimentcontrolled experiment, true experimental design, randomized controlled design, treatment-control design
קשורות54
תקצירThe double-blind pretest-posttest experimental design is a true experiment in which participants are randomly assigned to treatment and control conditions, outcome data are collected both before and after the intervention, and neither participants nor outcome assessors know which condition each participant received. Combining baseline measurement with strong blinding, the design controls for both pre-existing group differences and expectancy-driven bias, making it a gold-standard approach in clinical and behavioral research.Control group experimental design is a fundamental experimental structure in which participants are assigned to at least two groups — a treatment group that receives the intervention and a control group that does not — so that the effect of the intervention can be isolated by comparing outcomes across groups. Randomisation of assignment strengthens causal inference by balancing known and unknown confounders.
ScholarGateמערך נתונים
  1. v1
  2. 2 מקורות
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 מקורות
  3. PUBLISHED

מעבר לחיפוש הורדת מצגת

ScholarGateהשוואת שיטות: Double-blind pretest-posttest experimental design · Control Group Experimental Design. אוחזר בתאריך 2026-06-18 מתוך https://scholargate.app/he/compare