השוואת שיטות

	Direct Citation Clustering of Science	Author Co-Citation Analysis (ACA)
תחום	ביבליומטריה	ביבליומטריה
משפחה	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
שנת המקור	2010	1981
הוגה השיטה	Kevin W. Boyack & Richard Klavans; Ludo Waltman & Nees Jan van Eck	Howard D. White & Belver C. Griffith; later Howard D. White & Katherine W. McCain
סוג	Large-scale publication-level network clustering pipeline	Science-mapping pipeline using authors as units of analysis
מקור מכונן	Boyack, K. W., & Klavans, R. (2010). Co-citation analysis, bibliographic coupling, and direct citation: Which citation approach represents the research front most accurately? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(12), 2389-2404.	White, H. D., & Griffith, B. C. (1981). Author cocitation: A literature measure of intellectual structure. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 32(3), 163-171.
כינויים	Direct Citation Network Clustering, Publication-Level Citation Clustering, Citation-Based Science Mapping	ACA, Author Co-Citation Mapping, Cited-Author Co-Citation Analysis
קשורות	3	3
תקציר	Direct citation clustering maps the structure of science by linking publications through the citations that run directly between them and partitioning the resulting network into research areas. Unlike co-citation (which links papers cited together) or bibliographic coupling (which links papers sharing references), direct citation uses the citation itself as the edge: paper A is connected to paper B because A cites B. Kevin Boyack and Richard Klavans's 2010 comparison of citation approaches found that, at scale, direct citation can represent the research front at least as accurately as the alternatives, and Ludo Waltman and Nees Jan van Eck's 2012 methodology showed how to cluster very large direct-citation networks — millions of publications — into a coherent, publication-level classification of science using modularity-based community detection. Together these works established direct citation clustering as a leading technique for building large-scale science maps.	Author co-citation analysis (ACA) maps the intellectual structure of a research field by treating authors, rather than documents, as the units of analysis. Introduced by Howard White and Belver Griffith in 1981, ACA rests on a simple premise: when two authors are repeatedly cited together in the same later papers, the community of citers is signaling that their work is intellectually related. By counting these co-citations across a body of literature, assembling them into an author-by-author matrix, converting that matrix into similarities, and projecting it into a low-dimensional map, ACA recovers the 'specialties' or schools of thought that organize a discipline and shows how they relate to one another. White and McCain's 1998 study of information science, which mapped 120 leading authors over more than two decades, became the canonical demonstration of the method and established its workflow.