השוואת שיטות
סקרו את השיטות שבחרתם זו לצד זו; שורות שבהן יש הבדל מודגשות.
| Deterrence Analysis× | Situational Crime Prevention Analysis× | |
|---|---|---|
| תחום | Criminology | Criminology |
| משפחה | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| שנת המקור≠ | 1968 | 1997 |
| הוגה השיטה≠ | Cesare Beccaria & Jeremy Bentham (classical); Gary Becker & Daniel Nagin (modern) | Ronald V. Clarke |
| סוג≠ | Theory and empirical analysis of how punishment deters offending | Opportunity-reduction framework for crime prevention |
| מקור מכונן≠ | Nagin, D. S. (2013). Deterrence in the twenty-first century: A review of the evidence. Crime and Justice, 42(1), 199–263. DOI ↗ | Clarke, R. V. (Ed.). (1997). Situational Crime Prevention: Successful Case Studies (2nd ed.). Harrow and Heston. ISBN: 9780911577389 |
| כינויים | Deterrence Theory, Certainty-Severity-Celerity Analysis, Perceptual Deterrence Analysis, Focused Deterrence Analysis | SCP, Situational Prevention, Opportunity-Reduction Framework, Twenty-Five Techniques of Situational Crime Prevention |
| קשורות | 4 | 4 |
| תקציר≠ | Deterrence analysis studies how the threat and imposition of legal punishment discourage crime. Rooted in classical criminology and formalized in Gary Becker's economic model, it distinguishes the certainty, severity, and celerity of punishment, separates perceived from objective sanction risk, and uses quasi-experimental and perceptual evidence — synthesized by Daniel Nagin — to test how much, and through what channels, punishment actually deters. | Situational crime prevention (SCP) is a framework, developed by Ronald Clarke, for reducing crime by changing the immediate situations in which it occurs rather than the dispositions of offenders. It diagnoses the specific opportunities that make a crime easy, rewarding, or low-risk and then applies twenty-five practical techniques organized under five mechanisms: increase effort, increase risk, reduce rewards, reduce provocations, and remove excuses. |
| ScholarGateמערך נתונים ↗ |
|
|