השוואת שיטות

	סולם צניעות תרבותית	סולם רגישות תרבותית מטופל-מטפל
תחום	סיעוד בין-תרבותי	סיעוד בין-תרבותי
משפחה	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
שנת המקור	1998	2008
הוגה השיטה	Tervalon, Murray-García; Hook et al.	Dogba, Foley
סוג	Self-report	Self-report
מקור מכונן	Tervalon, M., & Murray-García, J. (1998). Cultural humility versus cultural competence: A critical distinction in defining physician training outcomes in multicultural education. Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved, 9(2), 117–125.	Dogba, M. J., & Foley, R. (2008). Patient preferences for involvement in healthcare decision-making: A comparison of interprofessional joint decision-making and traditional medical approaches. Health Expectations, 11(1), 68–76.
כינויים	CHS	PPCSS
קשורות	4	4
תקציר	The Cultural Humility Scale (CHS) is a self-report instrument designed to assess healthcare providers' capacity for cultural humility—a stance of openness, self-reflection, and power-sharing with patients from diverse cultural backgrounds. Originating from theoretical work by Tervalon and Murray-García (1998) and operationalized by Hook and colleagues (2013), the CHS measures clinicians' willingness to acknowledge limits in cultural knowledge, receptiveness to patient perspectives, and commitment to lifelong learning about culture. The instrument is widely used in medical, nursing, counseling, and other health professions education to evaluate trainees' readiness for culturally humble practice.	The Patient-Provider Cultural Sensitivity Scale (PPCSS) is a measure designed to assess the degree to which healthcare providers demonstrate cultural sensitivity and respect in clinical encounters. The instrument evaluates provider behaviors and attitudes that honor patients' cultural identities, values, and preferences, including active listening, non-judgmental communication, incorporation of cultural health beliefs into care planning, and shared decision-making. The PPCSS can be completed by both patients (rating provider behavior) and providers (self-rating), making it a valuable tool for evaluating patient-centered, culturally responsive care.