השוואת שיטות
סקרו את השיטות שבחרתם זו לצד זו; שורות שבהן יש הבדל מודגשות.
| עיצוב ABAB מתחלף× | תכנון מרובה קווי בסיס× | |
|---|---|---|
| תחום | תכנון ניסויים | תכנון ניסויים |
| משפחה | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| שנת המקור≠ | 1960s–1970s | 1968 |
| הוגה השיטה≠ | Murray Sidman and colleagues in applied behavior analysis | Donald M. Baer, Montrose M. Wolf, Todd R. Risley |
| סוג | Single-subject experimental design | Single-subject experimental design |
| מקור מכונן≠ | Barlow, D. H., Nock, M. K., & Hersen, M. (2009). Single Case Experimental Designs: Strategies for Studying Behavior Change (3rd ed.). Pearson. ISBN: 978-0205474929 | Baer, D. M., Wolf, M. M., & Risley, T. R. (1968). Some current dimensions of applied behavior analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1(1), 91–97. DOI ↗ |
| כינויים | ABAB reversal design, reversal design, withdrawal design, ABAB single-subject design | MBD, multiple-baseline single-case design, staggered baseline design, multiple-probe design |
| קשורות≠ | 2 | 4 |
| תקציר≠ | The crossover ABAB design is a single-subject experimental design that alternates between baseline (A) and intervention (B) conditions twice within the same participant. By withdrawing and reintroducing the treatment, the researcher can demonstrate experimental control: if behavior improves with B and reverts with A, the causal link between the intervention and the outcome is established without a separate control group. | The multiple baseline design is a single-subject experimental design that demonstrates functional control by introducing an intervention at staggered time points across two or more baselines — typically across different behaviors, individuals, or settings. Because no withdrawal of treatment is required, it is especially suitable when the target behavior is irreversible or when removing an effective intervention would be unethical. |
| ScholarGateמערך נתונים ↗ |
|
|