השוואת שיטות
סקרו את השיטות שבחרתם זו לצד זו; שורות שבהן יש הבדל מודגשות.
| ניתוח מטאפורות ביקורתי× | ניתוח מטאפורות פרשני× | |
|---|---|---|
| תחום | איכותני | איכותני |
| משפחה | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| שנת המקור≠ | 2004 | 1980 (conceptual foundations); 2000s (systematic qualitative procedure) |
| הוגה השיטה≠ | Jonathan Charteris-Black | Rudolf Schmitt (systematic procedure); grounded in Lakoff & Johnson's conceptual metaphor theory |
| סוג≠ | Qualitative-critical textual analysis | Qualitative interpretive analysis |
| מקור מכונן≠ | Charteris-Black, J. (2004). Corpus Approaches to Critical Metaphor Analysis. Palgrave Macmillan. ISBN: 978-1403932921 | Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. University of Chicago Press. ISBN: 978-0226468013 |
| כינויים | CMA, critical metaphor research, corpus-based critical metaphor analysis, ideological metaphor analysis | IMA, hermeneutic metaphor analysis, qualitative metaphor analysis, interpretive conceptual metaphor analysis |
| קשורות≠ | 5 | 6 |
| תקציר≠ | Critical Metaphor Analysis (CMA) is a qualitative method for uncovering how metaphorical language constructs, legitimises, or contests power relations and ideological positions in texts. Developed by Jonathan Charteris-Black (2004), it integrates Conceptual Metaphor Theory with the evaluative concerns of Critical Discourse Analysis to reveal the persuasive and ideological work performed by metaphors in political, institutional, and media discourse. | Interpretive metaphor analysis is a qualitative method that systematically identifies and interprets the conceptual metaphors embedded in participants' language to understand how they make meaning of their experiences. Rooted in Lakoff and Johnson's conceptual metaphor theory and adapted for empirical social research by Rudolf Schmitt, it applies a hermeneutic lens to treat metaphors not as stylistic ornaments but as windows into underlying cognitive and cultural frames. |
| ScholarGateמערך נתונים ↗ |
|
|