השוואת שיטות
סקרו את השיטות שבחרתם זו לצד זו; שורות שבהן יש הבדל מודגשות.
| Concept Mapping Assessment× | Rubric Development× | |
|---|---|---|
| תחום | Education | Education |
| משפחה | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| שנת המקור≠ | 1984 | 2007 |
| הוגה השיטה≠ | Joseph Novak & D. Bob Gowin; assessment use developed by Ruiz-Primo & Shavelson | Performance-assessment tradition (Andrade; Arter & McTighe; Jonsson & Svingby synthesis) |
| סוג≠ | Graphical assessment of the structure and connectedness of knowledge | Systematic design of criterion-based scoring guides for performance |
| מקור מכונן≠ | Novak, J. D., & Gowin, D. B. (1984). Learning How to Learn. Cambridge University Press. ISBN: 9780521319263 | Jonsson, A., & Svingby, G. (2007). The use of scoring rubrics: Reliability, validity and educational consequences. Educational Research Review, 2(2), 130–144. DOI ↗ |
| כינויים | Concept Map Assessment, Knowledge Structure Mapping, Concept Map Scoring, Novakian Concept Mapping | Scoring Rubric Design, Analytic and Holistic Rubrics, Performance Scoring Guides, Rubric Construction |
| קשורות | 4 | 4 |
| תקציר≠ | Concept mapping assessment uses student-generated diagrams of concepts and their relationships to evaluate the structure of knowledge, not just its quantity. A concept map represents ideas as labeled nodes connected by labeled links that form meaningful propositions, often arranged hierarchically with cross-links between branches. Developed from Novak and Gowin's work on meaningful learning and formalized as an assessment tool by Ruiz-Primo and Shavelson, it reveals how well a learner has organized and integrated a domain, exposing connections and misconceptions a multiple-choice test would miss. | Rubric development is the systematic design of criterion-referenced scoring guides for judging complex performance such as writing, projects, presentations, and problem solving. A rubric specifies the dimensions on which work is evaluated and describes, in ordered levels, what each degree of quality looks like. Done well — as the syntheses by Andrade and by Jonsson and Svingby show — rubrics make scoring more reliable and transparent, clarify expectations for students, and turn assessment into a tool for learning rather than merely a verdict. |
| ScholarGateמערך נתונים ↗ |
|
|