ScholarGate
עוזר

השוואת שיטות

סקרו את השיטות שבחרתם זו לצד זו; שורות שבהן יש הבדל מודגשות.

Concept Mapping Assessment×Rubric Development×
תחוםEducationEducation
משפחהProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
שנת המקור19842007
הוגה השיטהJoseph Novak & D. Bob Gowin; assessment use developed by Ruiz-Primo & ShavelsonPerformance-assessment tradition (Andrade; Arter & McTighe; Jonsson & Svingby synthesis)
סוגGraphical assessment of the structure and connectedness of knowledgeSystematic design of criterion-based scoring guides for performance
מקור מכונןNovak, J. D., & Gowin, D. B. (1984). Learning How to Learn. Cambridge University Press. ISBN: 9780521319263Jonsson, A., & Svingby, G. (2007). The use of scoring rubrics: Reliability, validity and educational consequences. Educational Research Review, 2(2), 130–144. DOI ↗
כינוייםConcept Map Assessment, Knowledge Structure Mapping, Concept Map Scoring, Novakian Concept MappingScoring Rubric Design, Analytic and Holistic Rubrics, Performance Scoring Guides, Rubric Construction
קשורות44
תקצירConcept mapping assessment uses student-generated diagrams of concepts and their relationships to evaluate the structure of knowledge, not just its quantity. A concept map represents ideas as labeled nodes connected by labeled links that form meaningful propositions, often arranged hierarchically with cross-links between branches. Developed from Novak and Gowin's work on meaningful learning and formalized as an assessment tool by Ruiz-Primo and Shavelson, it reveals how well a learner has organized and integrated a domain, exposing connections and misconceptions a multiple-choice test would miss.Rubric development is the systematic design of criterion-referenced scoring guides for judging complex performance such as writing, projects, presentations, and problem solving. A rubric specifies the dimensions on which work is evaluated and describes, in ordered levels, what each degree of quality looks like. Done well — as the syntheses by Andrade and by Jonsson and Svingby show — rubrics make scoring more reliable and transparent, clarify expectations for students, and turn assessment into a tool for learning rather than merely a verdict.
ScholarGateמערך נתונים
  1. v1
  2. 2 מקורות
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 מקורות
  3. PUBLISHED

מעבר לחיפוש הורדת מצגת

ScholarGateהשוואת שיטות: Concept Mapping Assessment · Rubric Development. אוחזר בתאריך 2026-06-24 מתוך https://scholargate.app/he/compare