ScholarGate
עוזר

השוואת שיטות

סקרו את השיטות שבחרתם זו לצד זו; שורות שבהן יש הבדל מודגשות.

ניתוח מהימנות של מבחן אדפטיבי ממוחשב×תיאוריית תגובת פריט (IRT)×
תחוםפסיכומטריהפסיכומטריה
משפחהLatent structureLatent structure
שנת המקור1970s–1980s1952–1968
הוגה השיטהDavid J. Weiss and IRT psychometriciansFrederic M. Lord (and Allan Birnbaum for the 2PL/3PL models)
סוגReliability estimation under adaptive testingProbabilistic measurement model
מקור מכונןWeiss, D. J. (1984). Application of computerized adaptive testing to educational problems. Journal of Educational Measurement, 21(4), 361–375. DOI ↗Lord, F. M. & Novick, M. R. (1968). Statistical Theories of Mental Test Scores. Addison-Wesley. link ↗
כינוייםCAT reliability, adaptive test reliability, IRT-based reliability estimation, marginal reliability in CATIRT, latent trait theory, item characteristic curve theory, modern test theory
קשורות45
תקצירCAT reliability analysis quantifies measurement precision in computerized adaptive tests where each examinee receives a unique, individually tailored subset of items. Rather than a single classical coefficient, it uses item response theory to express precision as conditional standard error of measurement at each ability level, and marginal reliability as a global summary across the ability distribution.Item response theory models the probability that a respondent answers an item correctly (or endorses it) as a function of the respondent's latent trait level and the item's own statistical properties — difficulty, discrimination, and guessing. Unlike classical test theory, IRT places persons and items on the same scale, yielding measurement that is sample-independent for items and test-independent for persons.
ScholarGateמערך נתונים
  1. v1
  2. 2 מקורות
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 מקורות
  3. PUBLISHED

מעבר לחיפוש הורדת מצגת

ScholarGateהשוואת שיטות: Computerized adaptive test reliability analysis · Item Response Theory. אוחזר בתאריך 2026-06-17 מתוך https://scholargate.app/he/compare