ScholarGate
עוזר

השוואת שיטות

סקרו את השיטות שבחרתם זו לצד זו; שורות שבהן יש הבדל מודגשות.

Competitive Dynamics (Action-Response) Analysis×Strategic Group Analysis×
תחוםניהול אסטרטגיניהול אסטרטגי
משפחהProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
שנת המקור19961977
הוגה השיטהMing-Jer Chen; Ken G. Smith, Walter Ferrier & Hermann NdoforMichael S. Hunt; Richard Caves & Michael Porter; John McGee & Howard Thomas
סוגAction-response interaction pipeline for interfirm rivalryIntra-industry clustering pipeline for strategic positioning
מקור מכונןChen, M.-J. (1996). Competitor Analysis and Interfirm Rivalry: Toward a Theoretical Integration. Academy of Management Review, 21(1), 100-134. DOI ↗Caves, R. E., & Porter, M. E. (1977). From Entry Barriers to Mobility Barriers: Conjectural Decisions and Contrived Deterrence to New Competition. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 91(2), 241-261. DOI ↗
כינוייםAction-Response Analysis, Competitive Interaction Analysis, Awareness-Motivation-Capability Analysis, Attack-and-Response AnalysisStrategic Groups Analysis, Mobility Barrier Analysis, Intra-Industry Group Analysis, Strategic Cluster Analysis
קשורות44
תקצירCompetitive dynamics analysis studies the actual sequence of competitive moves and countermoves between specific rival firms — who attacks, who responds, how fast, and with what consequence — rather than treating competition as a static structural condition. Ming-Jer Chen's 1996 Academy of Management Review article integrated competitor analysis with interfirm rivalry by introducing two pairwise constructs, market commonality and resource similarity, and organizing the prediction of competitive behavior around awareness, motivation, and capability (AMC). Smith, Ferrier, and Ndofor's 2001 review in the Blackwell Handbook of Strategic Management synthesized the field, codifying how competitive actions and responses are measured and linked to firm performance. The approach turns rivalry into observable, codable behavior — competitive actions and responses — and explains and predicts that behavior through firm-pair relationships and capabilities.Strategic group analysis partitions the firms in an industry into clusters that pursue similar strategies along key competitive dimensions, and explains why these clusters persist and why their members earn different returns. The concept originates with Michael Hunt's 1972 dissertation on the U.S. home-appliance industry and was given its theoretical engine by Caves and Porter's 1977 reconceptualization of entry barriers as mobility barriers — structural impediments that protect not just the industry from outsiders but each strategic group from incursion by firms in other groups. McGee and Thomas's 1986 review consolidated the construct, clarifying which variables legitimately define groups and how groups, mobility barriers, and isolating mechanisms relate to performance. The method bridges industrial-organization economics and strategic management by treating intra-industry structure, not just industry-level structure, as the relevant unit of competitive analysis.
ScholarGateמערך נתונים
  1. v1
  2. 2 מקורות
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 מקורות
  3. PUBLISHED

מעבר לחיפוש הורדת מצגת

ScholarGateהשוואת שיטות: Competitive Dynamics (Action-Response) Analysis · Strategic Group Analysis. אוחזר בתאריך 2026-06-24 מתוך https://scholargate.app/he/compare