ScholarGate
עוזר

השוואת שיטות

סקרו את השיטות שבחרתם זו לצד זו; שורות שבהן יש הבדל מודגשות.

Comparative Philology of Religious Languages×Ritual Density Coding×
תחוםReligious StudiesReligious Studies
משפחהProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
שנת המקור19952004
הוגה השיטהComparative philology tradition; Calvert Watkins (Indo-European poetics)Harvey Whitehouse
סוגHistorical-comparative linguistic methodCoding scheme for ritual transmission dynamics
מקור מכונןWatkins, C. (1995). How to Kill a Dragon: Aspects of Indo-European Poetics. New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN: 9780195085952Whitehouse, H. (2004). Modes of Religiosity: A Cognitive Theory of Religious Transmission. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press. ISBN: 9780759106147
כינוייםComparative Religious Philology, Historical-Comparative Sacred Language Analysis, Indo-European Religious Poetics, Etymology of Sacred VocabularyModes of Religiosity Coding, Frequency-Arousal Ritual Analysis, Imagistic vs Doctrinal Ritual Coding, Ritual Mode Classification
קשורות33
תקצירComparative philology of religious languages applies the historical-comparative method of linguistics - regular sound laws, cognate sets, and reconstruction - to the sacred vocabulary, ritual formulae, and poetic diction of related languages. Building on the comparative method that recovered Proto-Indo-European, Calvert Watkins's How to Kill a Dragon (1995) showed that one can reconstruct not only individual words but inherited phraseology and poetics, tracing formulae such as 'imperishable fame' and the dragon-slaying narrative from Hittite and Vedic through Greek and Germanic to medieval Irish. Applied to religion, the method uses systematic phonological correspondences to establish the prehistory of divine names, ritual terms, and liturgical expressions, reconstructing the proto-forms and inherited religious poetics that underlie attested traditions, while guarding against chance resemblance and borrowing.Ritual density coding is a method for analyzing religious rituals by coding them on two key dimensions - how often they are performed (frequency) and how emotionally intense or dysphoric they are (arousal) - in order to locate a tradition along Harvey Whitehouse's imagistic-doctrinal continuum. In his 2004 book Modes of Religiosity, Whitehouse argued that rituals tend to cluster at two attractor poles: high-frequency, low-arousal 'doctrinal' practices that build large, hierarchically organized, semantically rich traditions, and rare but emotionally searing 'imagistic' practices that forge small, intensely cohesive communities through vivid episodic memories. The coding scheme operationalizes this theory, testing the predicted inverse relationship between ritual frequency and arousal and linking the resulting modes to distinctive forms of social organization and memory.
ScholarGateמערך נתונים
  1. v1
  2. 1 מקורות
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 מקורות
  3. PUBLISHED

מעבר לחיפוש הורדת מצגת

ScholarGateהשוואת שיטות: Comparative Philology of Religious Languages · Ritual Density Coding. אוחזר בתאריך 2026-06-24 מתוך https://scholargate.app/he/compare