ScholarGate
עוזר

השוואת שיטות

סקרו את השיטות שבחרתם זו לצד זו; שורות שבהן יש הבדל מודגשות.

אתנוגרפיה דיגיטלית השוואתית×Thematic Analysis×
תחוםאיכותנימחקר איכותני
משפחהProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
שנת המקור1995–2000 (multi-sited framework 1995; virtual ethnography 2000)2006
הוגה השיטהChristine Hine (digital ethnography); George E. Marcus (multi-sited ethnography)Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke
סוגQualitative research designMethod
מקור מכונןHine, C. (2000). Virtual Ethnography. Sage. ISBN: 978-0761958963Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. DOI ↗
כינוייםCDE, multi-site digital ethnography, cross-platform ethnography, comparative virtual ethnographyTA, Reflexive Thematic Analysis
קשורות53
תקצירComparative Digital Ethnography (CDE) is a qualitative design that applies ethnographic methods — sustained participant observation, interview, and artefact analysis — across two or more digital settings simultaneously. By systematically comparing practices, meanings, and interactions in different online environments (e.g., distinct platforms, communities, or national contexts), CDE surfaces both site-specific patterns and cross-cutting cultural logics that a single-site study would miss.Thematic Analysis (TA) is a qualitative research methodology for identifying, analyzing, and reporting patterns (themes) in qualitative data. Developed systematically by Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke (2006), TA is flexible and accessible, applicable across diverse theoretical frameworks and data types, making it one of the most widely used qualitative methods in psychology, health research, and social sciences.
ScholarGateמערך נתונים
  1. v1
  2. 2 מקורות
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 מקורות
  3. PUBLISHED

מעבר לחיפוש הורדת מצגת

ScholarGateהשוואת שיטות: Comparative Digital Ethnography · Thematic Analysis. אוחזר בתאריך 2026-06-18 מתוך https://scholargate.app/he/compare