השוואת שיטות
סקרו את השיטות שבחרתם זו לצד זו; שורות שבהן יש הבדל מודגשות.
| אוטואתנוגרפיה השוואתית× | מחקר מקרה השוואתי× | |
|---|---|---|
| תחום | איכותני | איכותני |
| משפחה | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| שנת המקור≠ | 1979 (autoethnography); comparative application formalized ~2013 | 1984 (Yin); 1995 (Stake) |
| הוגה השיטה≠ | Hayano (term); developed further by Ellis, Bochner, Chang, Ngunjiri & Hernandez | Robert K. Yin; Robert E. Stake |
| סוג≠ | Qualitative research design | Qualitative / mixed research design |
| מקור מכונן≠ | Chang, H., Ngunjiri, F. W., & Hernandez, K.-A. C. (2013). Collaborative Autoethnography. Left Coast Press. ISBN: 978-1598745948 | Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods (6th ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1506336169 |
| כינויים | collaborative autoethnography, multi-sited autoethnography, cross-cultural autoethnography, CAE | cross-case study, multi-site case study, multiple case study design, comparative case analysis |
| קשורות≠ | 6 | 4 |
| תקציר≠ | Comparative autoethnography is a qualitative design in which two or more researchers — or research participants — independently produce first-person self-narratives about a shared phenomenon and then systematically compare those accounts to generate broader cultural insight. By juxtaposing lived experiences that differ by context, identity, or setting, the approach moves beyond the single-voice limitations of traditional autoethnography while retaining its hallmark reflexivity and personal depth. | Comparative case study is a qualitative research design in which two or more bounded cases are studied in depth and then systematically compared to identify similarities, differences, and patterns across contexts. Rooted in Yin's replication logic and Stake's multiple case framework, it is particularly suited to questions that ask how or why a phenomenon unfolds differently — or similarly — across distinct settings, populations, or time periods. |
| ScholarGateמערך נתונים ↗ |
|
|