ScholarGate
עוזר

השוואת שיטות

סקרו את השיטות שבחרתם זו לצד זו; שורות שבהן יש הבדל מודגשות.

מבנה מחקר עוקבה×תכנון מחקר מקרה-ביקורת×תכנון מחקר חתך×
תחוםמחקר קלינימחקר קלינימחקר קליני
משפחהProcess / pipelineProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
שנת המקור1970s-1980s1950s-1970s1950s-1970s
הוגה השיטהDonald Acheson, Olli Miettinen, and others in modern epidemiologyJerome L. Schlesselman, Brian MacMahon, Thomas PughEpidemiologists in the mid-20th century; formalized by Kelsey, Rothman, and others
סוגResearch DesignResearch DesignResearch Design
מקור מכונןMiettinen, O. S. (1976). Estimability and estimation in case-referent studies. American Journal of Epidemiology, 103(2), 226–235. DOI ↗Schlesselman, J. J. (1982). Case-Control Studies: Design, Conduct, Analysis. Oxford University Press. ISBN: 978-0195027815Kelsey, J. L., Whittemore, A. S., Evans, A. S., & Thompson, W. D. (1996). Methods in Observational Epidemiology (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press. ISBN: 978-0195083299
כינוייםprospective study, follow-up study, longitudinal study, cohort studycase-control study, retrospective study, matched case-control, nested case-controlprevalence study, cross-sectional survey, snapshot study, survey design
קשורות222
תקצירA cohort study follows a group of individuals forward in time from exposure to outcome. Exposed and unexposed participants (or participants with differing exposure levels) are enrolled at baseline, characterized, and observed prospectively until the outcome occurs or the study ends. Cohort studies are fundamental to epidemiology and are the design of choice for establishing causal associations when randomized trials are infeasible or unethical.A case-control study identifies individuals with a disease or outcome (cases) and a comparison group without the outcome (controls), then measures prior exposure retrospectively. Developed in the 1950s–1970s by epidemiologists like Schlesselman and MacMahon, case-control studies are especially efficient for rare diseases, as they sample cases enriched for the outcome, avoiding the need for enormous cohorts. They are a mainstay of clinical epidemiology, observational research, and outbreak investigations.A cross-sectional study (or prevalence study) measures exposure and outcome simultaneously at a single point in time, producing a 'snapshot' of a population. Respondents are recruited and surveyed (or examined) on the same occasion, capturing current prevalence of both exposure and disease. Cross-sectional studies are simple, quick, and inexpensive, making them popular for needs assessments, surveillance, and generating hypotheses—though they cannot establish causality due to lack of temporal sequence.
ScholarGateמערך נתונים
  1. v1
  2. 3 מקורות
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 מקורות
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 מקורות
  3. PUBLISHED

מעבר לחיפוש הורדת מצגת

ScholarGateהשוואת שיטות: Cohort Study Design · Case-Control Study Design · Cross-Sectional Study Design. אוחזר בתאריך 2026-06-18 מתוך https://scholargate.app/he/compare