השוואת שיטות
סקרו את השיטות שבחרתם זו לצד זו; שורות שבהן יש הבדל מודגשות.
| Ceramic Typology× | Radiocarbon Calibration× | |
|---|---|---|
| תחום | ארכאולוגיה | ארכאולוגיה |
| משפחה | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| שנת המקור≠ | 1987 | 2020 |
| הוגה השיטה≠ | Developed across 20th-century archaeology; synthesized by Prudence M. Rice | Hans Suess (first curves); IntCal Working Group (P. J. Reimer et al.) |
| סוג≠ | Attribute-based classification of pottery for chronology and cultural attribution | Probabilistic conversion of radiocarbon ages to calendar ages |
| מקור מכונן≠ | Rice, P. M. (1987). Pottery Analysis: A Sourcebook. University of Chicago Press. ISBN: 9780226711188 | Reimer, P. J., et al. (2020). The IntCal20 Northern Hemisphere Radiocarbon Age Calibration Curve (0-55 cal kBP). Radiocarbon, 62(4), 725-757. DOI ↗ |
| כינויים≠ | Pottery Typology, Ceramic Classification, Ware and Type Classification, Type-Variety Analysis | 14C Calibration, IntCal Calibration, Calendar Calibration of Radiocarbon Dates |
| קשורות≠ | 2 | 3 |
| תקציר≠ | Ceramic typology is the systematic classification of pottery into named groups — wares, types, and varieties — on the basis of shared attributes of form, fabric, surface treatment, decoration, and manufacturing technology. Because pottery is durable, ubiquitous, and changed rapidly in style, it is the archaeologist's most powerful tool for ordering sites and layers in time and for linking material to cultural traditions. As Prudence Rice's standard sourcebook sets out, a typology is built by recording consistent attributes, partitioning the assemblage into defined types, and arranging those types in a nested hierarchy that can then be quantified and compared across contexts. The resulting type frequencies become the raw material for relative dating, seriation, and the interpretation of trade, identity, and chronology. | Radiocarbon calibration converts a laboratory radiocarbon measurement into a probability distribution over actual calendar years. It is necessary because the assumptions behind a raw radiocarbon age are not exactly true: the concentration of carbon-14 in the atmosphere has varied over time, so a measured radiocarbon age does not equal a calendar age. Calibration corrects for this by comparing the measurement against an internationally agreed curve — currently IntCal20 — that records the relationship between radiocarbon age and calendar age, reconstructed from precisely dated tree rings, corals, speleothems, and other archives. Because the curve wiggles, calibration typically yields an irregular, sometimes multi-peaked range of calendar years rather than a single date, and that range is the proper expression of a radiocarbon result. |
| ScholarGateמערך נתונים ↗ |
|
|