השוואת שיטות
סקרו את השיטות שבחרתם זו לצד זו; שורות שבהן יש הבדל מודגשות.
| CASP RCT Checklist× | PRISMA Checklist: תקנים לדיווח על סקירות שיטתיות ומטא-אנליזות× | |
|---|---|---|
| תחום | מתודולוגיית מחקר | מתודולוגיית מחקר |
| משפחה | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| שנת המקור≠ | 1993 (updated through 2023) | 2021 (original 2009) |
| הוגה השיטה≠ | Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (Oxford, UK) | Page et al. (PRISMA Group) |
| סוג≠ | Clinician-rated / Research team assessment | Systematic review author reporting checklist |
| מקור מכונן≠ | Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP). (1993, updated). CASP Randomised Controlled Trials Checklist. University of Oxford, UK. www.casp-uk.net link ↗ | Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., ... & Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. DOI ↗ |
| כינויים | CASP-RCT, CASP | PRISMA, PRISMA 2020 |
| קשורות | 4 | 4 |
| תקציר≠ | The Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) RCT Checklist is a practical, widely adopted tool developed by the UK-based Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (founded 1993) for assessing the methodological quality and relevance of published randomized controlled trials. Unlike numeric scoring scales, it uses 11 structured questions with yes/no/cannot tell responses to guide critical appraisal in a format accessible to busy clinicians, researchers, and educators. | PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) is a 27-item evidence-based checklist published in 2021 (updated from 2009) to standardize reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Endorsed by over 500 journals, PRISMA is the international standard for evidence synthesis reporting, used across healthcare, psychology, education, and social sciences to ensure transparency and reproducibility. |
| ScholarGateמערך נתונים ↗ |
|
|