השוואת שיטות
סקרו את השיטות שבחרתם זו לצד זו; שורות שבהן יש הבדל מודגשות.
| ניתוח השוואת שיטות של בְּלַנְד-אַלְטְמַן× | אלפא של קרונבך (ניתוח מהימנות)× | |
|---|---|---|
| תחום | סטטיסטיקה | סטטיסטיקה |
| משפחה≠ | Hypothesis test | Latent structure |
| שנת המקור≠ | 1986 | 1951 |
| הוגה השיטה≠ | J. Martin Bland & Douglas G. Altman | Lee J. Cronbach |
| סוג≠ | Graphical and statistical method comparison | Reliability / internal consistency coefficient |
| מקור מכונן≠ | Bland, J.M. & Altman, D.G. (1986). Statistical Methods for Assessing Agreement Between Two Methods of Clinical Measurement. Lancet, 327(8476), 307–310. DOI ↗ | Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297–334. DOI ↗ |
| כינויים | Bland-Altman plot, limits of agreement analysis, method agreement analysis, Bland-Altman Uyum Analizi | coefficient alpha, alpha reliability, internal consistency reliability, Güvenilirlik Analizi (Cronbach Alpha) |
| קשורות≠ | 5 | 4 |
| תקציר≠ | The Bland-Altman analysis is a graphical and statistical technique for assessing agreement between two measurement methods applied to the same subjects. Introduced by J. Martin Bland and Douglas G. Altman in their landmark 1986 Lancet paper, it plots the difference between the two methods against their mean for each subject, and derives the bias (mean difference) along with limits of agreement (LoA) that capture 95% of differences in the population. | Cronbach's alpha is a coefficient of internal consistency that quantifies the degree to which a set of items on a scale measures the same underlying construct. Introduced by Lee J. Cronbach in 1951, it remains the most widely reported reliability index in social-science, health, and educational research. |
| ScholarGateמערך נתונים ↗ |
|
|