השוואת שיטות
סקרו את השיטות שבחרתם זו לצד זו; שורות שבהן יש הבדל מודגשות.
| התאמה מדויקת מגורענת בייסיאנית× | התאמת ציון נטייה בייסיאני× | |
|---|---|---|
| תחום | הסקה סיבתית | הסקה סיבתית |
| משפחה | Regression model | Regression model |
| שנת המקור≠ | 2011-2012 | 2012 |
| הוגה השיטה≠ | Iacus, King & Porro (CEM framework, 2012); Bayesian extensions by Hill and subsequent authors | Kaplan & Chen (2012); foundational PSM by Rosenbaum & Rubin (1983) |
| סוג≠ | Quasi-experimental matching with Bayesian inference | Bayesian causal inference / matching |
| מקור מכונן≠ | Iacus, S. M., King, G., & Porro, G. (2012). Causal Inference without Balance Checking: Coarsened Exact Matching. Political Analysis, 20(1), 1-24. DOI ↗ | Kaplan, D., & Chen, J. (2012). A Two-Step Bayesian Approach for Propensity Score Analysis: Simulations and Case Study. Psychometrika, 77(3), 581-609. DOI ↗ |
| כינויים≠ | Bayesian CEM, BCEM, Bayesian monotonic imbalance bounding matching | Bayesian PSM, BPSM, Bayesian matching estimator, Bayesian propensity weighting |
| קשורות | 6 | 6 |
| תקציר≠ | Bayesian Coarsened Exact Matching (Bayesian CEM) combines the coarsening-and-exact-matching framework of Iacus, King, and Porro with Bayesian posterior inference. Covariates are discretised into coarser bins so that treated and control units can be matched exactly within those bins, and Bayesian priors are then placed on the treatment-effect parameters to produce full posterior distributions over the causal estimand rather than a single point estimate. | Bayesian Propensity Score Matching (Bayesian PSM) extends classical propensity score matching by placing a prior distribution over the propensity model parameters and propagating posterior uncertainty through the matching and outcome stages. Introduced formally by Kaplan and Chen (2012), it offers a principled account of estimation uncertainty that frequentist matching commonly ignores, and allows incorporation of substantive prior knowledge about treatment selection. |
| ScholarGateמערך נתונים ↗ |
|
|