השוואת שיטות
סקרו את השיטות שבחרתם זו לצד זו; שורות שבהן יש הבדל מודגשות.
| Bass Diffusion Model× | Triple Helix Analysis× | |
|---|---|---|
| תחום | Science Technology Studies | Science Technology Studies |
| משפחה≠ | Regression model | Process / pipeline |
| שנת המקור≠ | 1969 | 2000 |
| הוגה השיטה≠ | Frank M. Bass | Henry Etzkowitz & Loet Leydesdorff |
| סוג≠ | Nonlinear diffusion / growth model | Innovation-systems framework and bibliometric indicator |
| מקור מכונן≠ | Bass, F. M. (1969). A new product growth for model consumer durables. Management Science, 15(5), 215-227. DOI ↗ | Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and 'Mode 2' to a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations. Research Policy, 29(2), 109-123. DOI ↗ |
| כינויים | Bass model, New product growth model, Innovation diffusion model | Triple Helix indicator, University-industry-government analysis, Triple Helix synergy analysis |
| קשורות≠ | 3 | 4 |
| תקציר≠ | The Bass diffusion model is a parsimonious mathematical model of how a new product or technology spreads through a market over time, introduced by Frank Bass in 1969. It represents adoption as the combined effect of two forces—external influence (mass media, advertising) acting on innovators and internal influence (word of mouth, imitation) acting on imitators—producing the characteristic S-shaped cumulative adoption curve from a fixed pool of eventual adopters. | Triple Helix analysis is a framework and bibliometric method for studying knowledge-based innovation as the evolving interplay of three institutional spheres—university, industry, and government. Rather than treating these as separate actors that occasionally cooperate, it models innovation as the overlapping, mutually shaping relations among them, and offers an information-theoretic indicator that quantifies how much the three spheres jointly reduce uncertainty in a knowledge economy. |
| ScholarGateמערך נתונים ↗ |
|
|