השוואת שיטות
סקרו את השיטות שבחרתם זו לצד זו; שורות שבהן יש הבדל מודגשות.
| Authoritarian Dynamic Measurement× | סולם אוריינטציית הדומיננטיות החברתית× | |
|---|---|---|
| תחום≠ | פסיכולוגיה פוליטית | פסיכולוגיה חברתית |
| משפחה | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| שנת המקור≠ | 2005 | 1994 |
| הוגה השיטה≠ | Karen Stenner & Stanley Feldman | Felicia Pratto, Jim Sidanius, Lisa Stallworth, and Bertram Malle |
| סוג≠ | Self-report predisposition measure | Self-report Likert scale |
| מקור מכונן≠ | Stenner, K. (2005). The authoritarian dynamic. New York: Cambridge University Press. ISBN: 9780521534789 | Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L. M., & Malle, B. F. (1994). Social Dominance Orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(4), 741–763. DOI ↗ |
| כינויים≠ | Child-Rearing Authoritarianism Scale, Stenner Authoritarianism Measure, Authoritarian Predisposition Scale | SDO |
| קשורות | 4 | 4 |
| תקציר≠ | The authoritarian-dynamic approach, developed by Stenner (2005) and Feldman (2003), measures authoritarianism as a latent predisposition toward favoring social conformity and order over individual autonomy and difference, typically assessed with four forced-choice child-rearing values items rather than attitude statements. Its distinctive claim is that intolerance is a dynamic product of this predisposition interacting with perceived normative threat. | The Social Dominance Orientation Scale (SDO) is a self-report measure developed by Pratto, Sidanius, Stallworth, and Malle in 1994 to assess individual differences in preference for group-based hierarchy and inequality. The scale measures the extent to which individuals support dominance of some groups over others, reject egalitarianism, and accept hierarchical social organization. It has become central to social dominance theory and is widely used in political psychology and intergroup relations research. |
| ScholarGateמערך נתונים ↗ |
|
|