ScholarGate
עוזר

השוואת שיטות

סקרו את השיטות שבחרתם זו לצד זו; שורות שבהן יש הבדל מודגשות.

נהלים אנליטיים בביקורת×מודל סיכון ביקורת×
תחוםחשבונאותחשבונאות
משפחהMCDMMCDM
שנת המקור19831983
הוגה השיטהAmerican Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA)American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA)
סוגAudit procedure methodologyProfessional auditing framework
מקור מכונןAmerican Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). (2015). Analytical Procedures. AU-C Section 520. AICPA Professional Standards. link ↗American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). (2015). Audit Risk. AU-C Section 200. AICPA Professional Standards. link ↗
כינוייםAnalytical Review, Ratio Analysis, Trend AnalysisRisk-Based Audit Planning Model
קשורות44
תקצירAnalytical procedures are evaluations of financial information made by studying plausible relationships among both financial and non-financial data. Rather than testing individual transactions, auditors develop expectations about what numbers should be and compare them to actual results, investigating significant differences. This approach is both required during audit planning and is often more cost-effective than detailed transaction testing.The Audit Risk Model is a foundational framework developed by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) that structures audit planning by decomposing overall audit risk into three components: inherent risk, control risk, and detection risk. This model guides auditors in allocating resources and designing audit procedures proportionate to the level of risk in each account or assertion.
ScholarGateמערך נתונים
  1. v1
  2. 2 מקורות
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 מקורות
  3. PUBLISHED

מעבר לחיפוש הורדת מצגת

ScholarGateהשוואת שיטות: Analytical Procedures in Auditing · Audit Risk Model. אוחזר בתאריך 2026-06-19 מתוך https://scholargate.app/he/compare