השוואת שיטות
סקרו את השיטות שבחרתם זו לצד זו; שורות שבהן יש הבדל מודגשות.
| Actor-Network Theory Analysis× | Social Construction of Technology× | |
|---|---|---|
| תחום | Science Technology Studies | Science Technology Studies |
| משפחה | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| שנת המקור | 1984 | 1984 |
| הוגה השיטה≠ | Bruno Latour, Michel Callon, John Law | Trevor Pinch & Wiebe Bijker |
| סוג≠ | Material-semiotic theory and analytic method | Constructivist theory of technological development |
| מקור מכונן≠ | Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford University Press. ISBN: 9780199256051 | Pinch, T. J., & Bijker, W. E. (1984). The social construction of facts and artefacts: or how the sociology of science and the sociology of technology might benefit each other. Social Studies of Science, 14(3), 399-441. DOI ↗ |
| כינויים | ANT analysis, Sociology of translation, Actant-network mapping | SCOT, Social constructivism of technology, Interpretive flexibility analysis |
| קשורות | 4 | 4 |
| תקציר≠ | Actor-Network Theory analysis treats society and technology as a single woven fabric, mapping how heterogeneous human and non-human actors—engineers, scallops, documents, machines, regulators—are linked into networks through a process of translation. Rather than explaining technical outcomes by appeal to pre-given social categories, ANT follows the actors themselves and describes how durable arrangements are assembled, stabilised, and sometimes undone. | The Social Construction of Technology (SCOT) is a constructivist framework holding that technological artefacts are shaped by the interpretations and negotiations of relevant social groups rather than by technical logic alone. Introduced by Trevor Pinch and Wiebe Bijker in 1984, it shows that an artefact has 'interpretive flexibility'—different groups see different problems and solutions in it—until a process of closure stabilises one design as the obvious one. |
| ScholarGateמערך נתונים ↗ |
|
|