Dossier de preuve de méthode

Interpretive Metaphor Analysis

Interpretive metaphor analysis is a qualitative method that systematically identifies and interprets the conceptual metaphors embedded in participants' language to understand how they make meaning of their experiences. Rooted in Lakoff and Johnson's conceptual metaphor theory and adapted for empirical social research by Rudolf Schmitt, it applies a hermeneutic lens to treat metaphors not as stylistic ornaments but as windows into underlying cognitive and cultural frames.

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Dossier source

Citations copiées telles quelles du dossier source de la méthode. Aucune vérification au niveau de la revendication n'en est déduite.

Dossier de méthode taxonomique · process-pipeline / qualitative

Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. University of Chicago Press. · ISBN 978-0226468013
Schmitt, R. (2005). Systematic metaphor analysis as a method of qualitative research. The Qualitative Report, 10(2), 358–394. · URL

Ouvrir la méthode complète

Revendications organisées

Revendications enregistrées dans le registre de preuves, chacune avec sa propre évaluation.

Pas encore de revendications organisées

Cette vue n'invente pas d'évaluation de revendication lorsque le registre n'en contient aucune.

Méthodes apparentées

Généré à partir du graphe de méthodes et présenté comme des relations suggérées par la machine — aucune revendication de preuve n'est déduite.

Same method familyCritical Discourse Analysismachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyDiscourse Analysismachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Taxonomic bucketInterpretive content analysismachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Taxonomic bucketInterpretive Discourse Analysismachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyMetaphor Analysismachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyThematic Analysismachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.