Dossier de preuve de méthode

Dyadic Conflict Analysis

Dyadic conflict analysis is the dominant research design in quantitative conflict studies: it treats the pair of states (the dyad), observed year by year, as the unit of analysis and models the probability that a pair experiences militarized conflict as a function of their joint and individual attributes. Stuart Bremer's 'Dangerous Dyads' (1992) is the canonical statement, identifying which conditions — contiguity, the absence of alliance, power parity, the absence of joint democracy, and others — make a pair of states war-prone. The design aligns conflict data with the relational theories that dominate the field.

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Dossier source

Citations copiées telles quelles du dossier source de la méthode. Aucune vérification au niveau de la revendication n'en est déduite.

Dyad-Year Analysis of Interstate Conflict

Dossier de méthode taxonomique · process-pipeline / international-relations

Bremer, S. A. (1992). Dangerous dyads: Conditions affecting the likelihood of interstate war, 1816–1965. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 36(2), 309–341. · DOI 10.1177/0022002792036002005

Ouvrir la méthode complète

Revendications organisées

Revendications enregistrées dans le registre de preuves, chacune avec sa propre évaluation.

Pas encore de revendications organisées

Cette vue n'invente pas d'évaluation de revendication lorsque le registre n'en contient aucune.

Méthodes apparentées

Généré à partir du graphe de méthodes et présenté comme des relations suggérées par la machine — aucune revendication de preuve n'est déduite.

Same method familyCorrelates of War Analysismachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Taxonomic bucketDemocratic Peace Analysismachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyMilitarized Interstate Dispute Analysismachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.